Better in than out
Second fiddle no more
parallax background

Ukraine’s green hydrogen potential

Kyiv sees itself as one of Europe's largest exporters of clean energy

May 2, 2024

10 min read

By

May 2, 2024

By

10 min read

Photo by Engin Akyurt on Unsplash.

Ukraine’s Energy Minister Herman Galushchenko has long said that renewables will play a major role in the reconstruction of the country.

Last year, Ukraine adopted its latest Energy Strategy, which enshrined the country’s green course in law. It stipulates that by 2030, the share of renewables in the energy mix should be at least 25 per cent, and by 2050, Ukraine should achieve climate neutrality.

According to the calculations of the Institute of Renewable Energy of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, the country’s potential for creating renewable energy generators reaches 770.7 GW. The total potential annual production of renewable hydrogen is 44.96 million tonnes.

Before Russia began its war on Ukraine, the installed capacity of renewables in the country was more than 10 GW. As a result of the Russian aggression, the figure has dropped to 6.5 GW—many renewable energy facilities were occupied, in regions where active fighting is ongoing. 

However, in early 2024, Ukraine’s Ministry of Energy reported that even in times of war, the share of renewables in the country’s energy mix remains significant. In 2023, about 10 per cent of electricity was generated by wind and solar power plants.  Over the period 2022-23, more than 650 additional MW of renewable energy capacity was built in Ukraine.

By 2050, Ukraine has the potential to increase wind generation capacity to 140 GW, solar generation to 94 GW, energy storage to 38 GW, nuclear generation to 30 GW, CHP and bioenergy capacity to 18 GW, and hydro generation to 9 GW. In addition to generating electricity from the sun and wind, the production of renewable gases such as biomethane and green hydrogen has significant prospects, which can become an important component of the energy transformation of both Ukraine and the EU.

According to the calculations of the energy ministry, this will require at least 10 billion US dollars in investments.

The importance of international partnership

In the summer of 2024, the energy ministry plans to finalise its draft hydrogen strategy. The document addresses hydrogen production, transportation and storage, and includes an analysis of potential hydrogen resources. The ministry is developing the project together with the Institute of Renewable Energy of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine.

The draft contains a list of measures necessary for Ukraine’s ‘green’ transformation and entry into the European hydrogen energy market. The implementation of the hydrogen strategy in Ukraine will be carried out in three stages and includes creating the basis for a hydrogen economy in Ukraine and introducing an export market for green hydrogen; diversification of primary energy sources through increased hydrogen production; expansion of the hydrogen market, including the export component.

Ukraine will rely on international cooperation to accelerate the implementation of this strategy. To this end, draft framework agreements, a regulatory framework, a resource and production base, and infrastructure for hydrogen storage and transportation are being developed.

Ukraine’s green hydrogen export potential

Currently, Ukraine produces approximately 360,000 tonnes of hydrogen per year, which is mainly used for ammonia production. Although this is only 0.5 per cent of total global demand, with technological development and investment, Ukraine can significantly increase its hydrogen production capacity.

Central European directives, such as the European Commission’s Green Hydrogen for the European Green Deal: 2×40 GW Initiative, define Ukraine as a strategic partner in the development of renewable hydrogen. These strategic documents envisage the construction of up to 10 GW of electrolysis capacities in Ukraine by 2030, designed to produce renewable hydrogen. About 1.8 GW of this capacity is for the domestic market, mainly for the production of green ammonia, a critical commodity for the agricultural sector.

Germany itself sees Ukraine as one of its key potential partners on the European continent to achieve its own domestic hydrogen goals. According to the German National Hydrogen Council, a Central European Hydrogen Corridor between Ukraine and Germany could be used for hydrogen transportation. A consortium of four European gas network operators first proposed the corridor in September 2021 and confirmed its feasibility in November 2022.

H2U Hydrogen Valley

One of the most developed and ambitious hydrogen initiatives in Ukraine is the Ukrainian pilot project H2U Hydrogen Valley, which is being implemented by Hydrogen of Ukraine. The project is part of the international Mission Innovation initiative.

Within the framework of H2U Hydrogen Valley, two hydrogen valleys are being created in the Odesa and Zakarpattia regions. According to Yaroslav Kryl, CEO of Hydrogen of Ukraine, the projects are still unstable. “The war-torn country cannot make large public investments in hydrogen projects and instead relies on private sector commitments. The decisive criterion for hydrogen production projects in Ukraine is primarily their economic feasibility,” says Kryl.

The first stage of the project will see the construction of a 100 megawatt electrolysis facility in the port city of Reni on the Danube in Odesa Oblast. In the medium term, the capacity is expected to increase to 200 MW. German company Ludwig Bölkow Systemtechnik is advising the company on the project.

Electricity for electrolysis will come from wind and solar power plants. The water needed for electrolysis will come from the Danube and its tributaries.

The second hydrogen valley is located in Zakarpattia in the border region with Slovakia and Hungary. An electrolysis capacity of 1100 MW with the possibility of expansion to 1500 MW will be built on an area of 120 hectares.

The project includes a 120 MW solar plant with a scalable capacity of up to 1200 MW and 160 MW wind turbines. This initiative aims to fully integrate new renewable energy sources into the United Energy System of Ukraine.

The hydrogen produced is intended for export to a steel plant in Košice, Slovakia, which wants to switch from coke to hydrogen in the production of iron ore. In addition, it is planned to establish a connection to the trans-European transportation corridor to Germany.

Russia’s invasion has delayed development

According to Ihor Syrota, CEO of the state-owned hydrogen generating company Ukrhydroenergo, the firm had considered green hydrogen production before the war. In December 2022, Ukrhydroenergo presented a pilot project for the production of green hydrogen at the DniproHES hydroelectric power plant, with a nominal capacity of 1 MW. It was announced that the company would cooperate with European partners to build an electrolyser that would produce 210 m3 of green hydrogen per hour.

In October 2023, a memorandum was signed between Ukrhydroenergo and the German company Andritz Hydro on cooperation within the framework of the German national hydrogen strategy programme.

After the Russian air attack on March 22, 2024, DniproHES lost more than 1,000 MW of capacity out of a total of 1,500 MW. It will take some time to restore the power facility and, according to Syrota, international financial support will be needed. The scope of work and its cost have not yet been determined. The issue of connecting Europe’s most powerful hydroelectric facility to the Ukrainian power grid is still under consideration.

Despite the destruction of DniproHES, the hydrogen project is not dead. According to Syrota, the project is ongoing. The German partners of the Green Hydrogen project, Andritz Hydro, continue with preparatory work.

Prior to Russia’s invasion, several Ukrainian private energy companies had announced their intention to produce green hydrogen.

In 2021, MCL announced the construction of a modern 320 MW Volodymyrets wind farm in Rivne region, western Ukraine, by 2023. MCL is engaged in the development of electricity generation facilities from renewables. According to the company, the project has been postponed until 2025.

The wind farm would consist of 12 innovative wind turbines of 6 MW each, with a total capacity of 72 MW. MCL experts claim that the projected electricity production will be about 230 GWh per year. The electricity generated by the wind turbines will be used to split water in industrial electrolysers into oxygen and hydrogen. The resulting “green” hydrogen will be liquefied and transported to the consumer, Rivne Azot, for ammonia production.

Another potential project was announced in 2021 by the Lviv-based Eco-Optima group of companies. It planned to build a 100 MW green hydrogen plant. Eco-Optima has two main areas of activity: oil and gas production with ancillary works, as well as alternative electricity generation.

As such, the company has built solar and wind power plants with a total capacity of 150 MW. It is continuing to build a new 55 MW wind farm and is commissioning new solar power plants. However, the company has postponed the hydrogen project although, according to the company’s owner Zinoviy Kozitsky, it will consider hydrogen energy in the long term.

The war also adjusted DTEK’s plans. In the summer of 2020, DTEK was the first Ukrainian company to join the Hydrogen Europe Association. In 2021, the company planned to launch pilot projects to produce green hydrogen. “Green hydrogen is an area where we want to be leaders,” DTEK CEO Maxim Timchenko told Ukrainian media.

Now, while he notes that DTEK managers see the potential benefits of green hydrogen for Ukraine and continue to analyse their long-term opportunities, in the near future, the firm will focus on developing an integrated portfolio of renewable energy sources through wind, solar and grid projects, as well as battery stations.

Shipping hydrogen

Ukraine is considering various option to transport hydrogen to the European Union. One is a pipeline through the Ukrainian gas transportation system. In November 2023, the European Commission supported a project to create a Central European Hydrogen Corridor between Ukraine, Slovakia, Czechia, Austria, and Germany.

According to Oleksandr Repkin, a board member of the Ukrainian Hydrogen Council, hydrogen is not to be transported in its pure form, as it can quickly damage a pipe, but mixed with natural gas. The initial concentration is 1.5 per cent hydrogen, which could be increased to five per cent later.

Another method is river or road, which involves different technological approaches: liquefaction and transportation using a so-called ‘organic carrier’.

Liquefaction is a classic option for transporting gaseous substances. The economic feasibility will depend on demand, availability of a container fleet (the cost of one container can reach 700,000 euros) and the accompanying infrastructure for gasification, regasification and cooling (liquefied hydrogen must be kept at a temperature of -254C).

Repkin says that, “When transported by river or sea, the most optimal is to transport a mixture of hydrogen in ammonia or methanol.” According to him, Ukraine has a sufficient ship fleet of more than 60 vessels of the Ukrainian-Danube Shipping Company and related infrastructure for river transportation of hydrogen using the so-called organic carrier—ethanol or ammonia. Here, Ukraine is cooperating with the government of Japan.

As part of a  feasibility study for the hydrogen project in the Odesa region, the experience of using an organic carrier for hydrogen transportation was studied.

“The most effective technology at present is that proposed by Hydrogenious LOHC Technologies, namely the use of benzotoluene. When using an organic carrier, there is no need to make changes to the existing tanks and containers used to transport traditional oil products, which reduces the real final cost of hydrogen,” says Repkin.

This article was co-authored by Viacheslav Lining with the support of Europe-Ukraine Desk/n-ost.

Photo by Engin Akyurt on Unsplash.

Yulia Valova

Yulia Valova

Yulia Valova is a journalist and energy market analyst.

Share

You might also find these insightful

✕

Case study: Global technology company

1. The Client

A global technology company operating across EMEA, with a regional HQ in Istanbul. The company manages 20+ markets, handling everything from brand campaigns to strategic partnerships.

Role we worked with: The EMEA Head of Marketing (supported by two regional managers).

2. The Challenge

Despite strong products and a respected global brand, the regional team was struggling with:

  • Misaligned strategy across markets → campaigns executed with inconsistent narratives.
  • Slowed growth → lead generation plateaued despite increasing spend.
  • Internal friction → marketing, sales, and product teams disagreed on KPIs and priorities.

Traditional fixes (more meetings, more reporting) only created more noise.

3. The Sprint

We ran a 10-day Remote Reinvention Sprint with the regional HQ team.

  • Day 1–3: Intake → Reviewed decks, campaign data, and plans.
  • Day 4: Sprint Session (90 mins) → Breakthroughs:
    • Sales and marketing had different definitions of “qualified lead.”
    • 40% of spend was going into low-potential markets.
    • The team assumed the problem was lack of budget, but it was actually lack of alignment.
  • Day 5–10: Synthesis → Insights distilled into a Clarity Brief + Insight Canvas.
4. The Breakthrough

The Sprint uncovered that the issue wasn’t budget, but fragmentation.
Three sharp insights unlocked a way forward:

  1. Unified KPIs bridging marketing + sales.
  2. Market prioritisation → shifting budget to 5 high-potential markets.
  3. Simplified narrative → one EMEA core story, locally adaptable.
By just realigning resources and focus, the client could unlock an estimated £250,000 in efficiency gains within the next 12 months — far exceeding the Sprint’s value guarantee. The path to higher returns was already inside the business, hidden by misalignment.
5. From Sprint to Action (4 Pillars Applied)

With clarity secured, Reinvantage didn’t suggest “more projects.”

Instead, we used the Sprint findings to create laser-focused next steps — drawing only from the areas that would deliver the most impact:

  • Readiness → Alignment workshops for sales + marketing teams. New playbooks clarified “qualified lead” definitions and reduced internal disputes.
  • Foresight → A market-opportunity scan identified which 5 countries would deliver the highest ROI, removing the guesswork from allocation.
  • Growth → Guided the reallocation of €2M budget and designed a phased rollout strategy that protected risk while maximising return.
  • Positioning → Built a messaging framework balancing global consistency with local nuance, ensuring campaigns spoke with one clear voice.

Because the Sprint had stripped away noise, these actions weren’t generic consulting ideas — they were directly tied to the breakthroughs.

6. The Results
  • +28% increase in qualified leads across the region.
  • 30% faster campaign rollout due to streamlined approvals.
  • Budget efficiency gains → €2M redirected from low-return to high-potential markets.
  • Internal cohesion → marketing + sales now use a single shared dashboard.
The client came in believing they needed more budget.
The Sprint revealed that what they really needed was clarity and alignment.

With that clarity, the four pillars became not theory, but practical tools to deliver measurable impact.

The Sprint guaranteed at least £20,000 in value — but in this case, it helped unlock more than 10x that within six months.
✕

Case study: Regional VC fund & accelerator

1. The Client

A regional venture capital fund and accelerator focused on early-stage tech start-ups in the Baltics and Central Europe.

The fund had raised a new round and was under pressure to deliver stronger returns while also building its reputation as the go-to platform for founders.

Role we worked with: Managing Partner, supported by the Head of Portfolio Development.

2. The Challenge

Despite a promising portfolio, results were uneven.

Key issues:

  • Scattered portfolio support → no consistent playbook for start-ups, every partner did things differently.
  • Weak differentiation → founders and co-investors saw the fund as “one of many” in the region.
  • Stretched team → too many small bets, not enough clarity on which companies to double down on.

The leadership team knew something was off, but disagreed on whether the issue was pipeline quality, market conditions, or internal capacity.

3. The Sprint

We ran a 10-day Remote Reinvention Sprint with the partners and portfolio team.

  • Day 1–3: Intake → Reviewed pitch decks, pipeline funnel data, and start-up performance reports.
  • Day 4: Sprint Session (90 mins) → Breakthroughs:
    • No shared definition of a “high-potential founder.”
    • Support resources were spread too thin across the portfolio.
    • The fund’s positioning was more reactive than proactive — it didn’t own a distinctive narrative in the market.
  • Day 5–10: Synthesis → Insights consolidated into a Clarity Brief + Insight Canvas.
4. The Breakthrough

The Sprint revealed that the challenge wasn’t pipeline quality — it was lack of focus and positioning.

Three core insights provided the turning point:

  1. Portfolio Prioritisation Framework → defined clear criteria for where to double down.
  2. Founder Success Playbook → standardised support model for portfolio companies.
  3. Differentiated Narrative → repositioned the fund as “the accelerator of reinvention-ready founders.”
These shifts alone gave the fund a path to add an estimated £2M+ in portfolio value over the following 18 months, by concentrating capital and resources where they could move the needle most.
5. From Sprint to Action (4 Pillars Applied)

With clarity from the Sprint, Reinvantage created a tailored support plan:

  • Readiness → Coached partners on using the new prioritisation framework and trained the team on deploying the Founder Success Playbook.
  • Foresight → Ran scenario analysis on regional tech trends, helping the fund anticipate where capital would flow next.
  • Growth → Guided resource reallocation across the portfolio and supported new co-investor pitches for top-performing start-ups.
  • Positioning → Crafted a sharper brand story for the fund, positioning it as the reinvention partner for globally minded founders.
6. The Results
  • 10 portfolio companies onboarded to the new Playbook → greater consistency of support.
  • Raised follow-on capital for 3 top start-ups with the new prioritisation framework.
  • +26% increase in inbound deal flow from founders citing the fund’s new positioning.
  • Stronger internal cohesion → partners aligned on where to focus resources.
The client thought the problem was pipeline quality.
The Sprint showed it was actually lack of clarity and focus inside the firm.

By applying the four pillars, Reinvantage helped turn scattered effort into concentrated value creation.

The Sprint guaranteed at least £20,000 in value; here it set the stage for multi-million-pound upside in portfolio growth.
✕

Case study: International impact Organisation

1. The Client

A large international impact organisation focused on entrepreneurship and economic empowerment.
The organisation runs multi-country programmes across Eastern Europe and Central Asia, often in partnership with global donors and corporate sponsors.

Role we worked with: Senior Programme Director, responsible for regional coordination.

2. The Challenge

The organisation had launched a flagship regional initiative supporting women entrepreneurs, but the programme was underperforming.

Key issues:

  • Fragmented delivery → each country office interpreted the programme differently.
  • Donor frustration → reporting lacked consistency and clear impact metrics.
  • Lost momentum → staff energy was spent on administration rather than scaling success stories.

Traditional programme reviews had produced long reports, but no real alignment or action.

3. The Sprint

We ran a 10-day Remote Reinvention Sprint with the regional leadership team and representatives from two country offices.

  • Day 1–3: Intake → Reviewed donor reports, programme KPIs, and field feedback.
  • Day 4: Sprint Session (90 mins) → Breakthroughs:
    • Donors cared about quantifiable outcomes, but reporting focused on stories.
    • Staff were duplicating efforts across countries, wasting time and resources.
    • The initiative lacked a clear theory of change — everyone described its purpose differently.
  • Day 5–10: Synthesis → Insights distilled into a Clarity Brief + Insight Canvas.
4. The Breakthrough

The Sprint revealed that the issue wasn’t donor pressure or programme design — it was a lack of shared framework and alignment.

Three critical insights reshaped the path forward:

  1. One Unified Theory of Change → agreed narrative for why the programme exists.
  2. Core Impact Metrics → clear, comparable KPIs across all countries.
  3. Smart Resource Sharing → digital hub to stop duplication and accelerate knowledge flow.
By eliminating duplicated reporting and clarifying what success looks like, the client saw they could save the equivalent of £100,000 in staff time annually — while also unlocking stronger donor confidence and follow-on funding opportunities.
5. From Sprint to Action (4 Pillars Applied)

Armed with Sprint clarity, Reinvantage proposed a laser-focused support plan:

  • Readiness → Trained programme leads on using the new metrics and integrated them into existing workflows.
  • Foresight → Analysed donor trends and expectations, aligning the initiative with the next funding cycle.
  • Growth → Developed a funding case based on the new unified theory of change, securing higher renewal chances.
  • Positioning → Crafted a regional success narrative and storytelling toolkit, helping them showcase results consistently across markets.
6. The Results
  • 30% less time spent on reporting → freed capacity for programme delivery.
  • Donor satisfaction improved → positive feedback on the clarity of impact evidence.
  • Secured new funding commitment → one major donor increased their contribution by 20%.
  • Stronger internal morale → staff felt they were working with clarity, not chaos.
The client thought it needed better donor management.
The Sprint revealed it needed a shared foundation across its teams.

By anchoring on the four pillars, Reinvantage turned alignment into efficiency gains and fresh funding opportunities.

The Sprint guaranteed at least £20,000 in value; here it unlocked both six-figure savings and future-proofed funding.
✕

Case study: National digital development agency

1. The Client

A national digital development agency tasked with driving the government’s digital transformation agenda, including e-services, citizen portals, and smart city pilots.

Role we worked with: Director of Digital Transformation, supported by IT and service delivery leads from three ministries.

2. The Challenge

The agency had strong political backing but faced hurdles in implementation.

Key issues:

  • Siloed projects → each ministry developed digital tools independently, leading to duplication.
  • Citizen frustration → services were digital in name, but still required multiple logins and offline steps.
  • Funding pressure → international partners demanded clearer impact in the short term.

The agency wanted to accelerate momentum but struggled to get alignment across ministries.

3. The Sprint

We ran a 14-day Immersive Reinvention Sprint with the agency’s leadership and digital focal points from three ministries.

  • Day 1–3: Intake → Reviewed strategy docs, donor reports, and citizen feedback data.
  • Day 4: Immersive Sprint Session (half-day) → Breakthroughs:
    • Each ministry had different definitions of “digital service.”
    • 20% of budget was going into overlapping pilot projects.
    • Citizens’ top frustrations were known — but not prioritised.
  • Day 5–14: Synthesis → Insights consolidated into a Clarity Brief + Insight Canvas.
4. The Breakthrough

The Sprint revealed that the biggest blocker wasn’t lack of funding, but lack of shared priorities.

Three practical insights stood out:

  1. One Definition of Digital Service → agreed across ministries.
  2. Quick-Win Prioritisation → focus on top 3 citizen pain points (ID renewal, business registration, healthcare booking).
  3. Shared Resource Map → pool budgets to eliminate duplication.
These changes alone allowed the agency to unlock £75,000 in immediate savings and deliver 2–3 visible improvements in the next quarter — meeting donor expectations and building citizen trust.
5. From Sprint to Action (4 Pillars Applied)

Based on the Sprint clarity, Reinvantage proposed a modest, targeted package of support:

  • Readiness → Facilitated inter-ministerial workshops to embed the “one digital service” definition.
  • Foresight → Analysed citizen feedback trends to shape the quick-win roadmap.
  • Growth → Supported the reallocation of funds to joint projects, reducing overlap.
  • Positioning → Crafted a communication plan highlighting early digital wins to donors and citizens.
6. The Results
  • 2 pilot services integrated into the central portal (ID renewal + healthcare booking).
  • Budget savings of £75,000 from eliminating overlapping projects.
  • Citizen satisfaction up modestly → call centre complaints on digital services dropped by 12%.
  • Donor confidence improved → short-term impact report received positive feedback.
The client thought it needed more funding and bigger projects.
The Sprint revealed it first needed clarity and alignment.

By applying the four pillars to a targeted scope, Reinvantage helped deliver visible results within a single quarter — proving progress to citizens and donors and laying the groundwork for deeper transformation.