Soft power, hard currency
Splitting atoms, burying coal
parallax background

Warp speed ahead

If you’re still picturing CEE as a region of failing state factories, it’s time to wake up

March 27, 2025

5 min read

March 27, 2025

5 min read

For investors with long memories, Central and Eastern Europe once meant navigating a maze of murky privatisations, brown envelopes and grey suits in smoky boardrooms. The region was seen as a somewhat edgy bet for brave Western capitalists—exciting perhaps, but hardly stable.

Today, however, investment in the region increasingly resembles something out of a Silicon Valley slide deck, complete with buzzwords such as innovation, entrepreneurship and sustainability. The smokiest thing you’ll find now might well be artisanal vegan sausages sizzling on a grill at a start-up incubator’s barbecue.

However, behind the slick slide decks, the region’s transformation is real—and for investors who understand how the rules have changed, there’s plenty of money to be made.

According to a recent report from Dealroom, the Central and Eastern European start-up ecosystem has soared to 243 billion euros in total worth, growth of almost 25 per cent since 2022. With over 3,800 active start-ups and 275 scale-ups, the region is steadily advancing despite challenges such as the Covid-19 pandemic and late-stage funding issues.

Reinventing reinvention

Central and Eastern Europe’s knack for reinvention is nothing new. It’s embedded deeply in the region’s DNA: a survival instinct honed by decades—if not centuries—of geopolitical upheaval.

But today’s reinvention differs fundamentally from the post-1989 scramble for economic relevance. Rather than simply copying Western blueprints or becoming low-cost factories, countries such as Estonia, Poland, Czechia, Romania and even war-weary Ukraine are writing their own scripts.

Take Poland, for instance. Once mocked as Europe’s supplier of plumbers, today it exports software engineers. The start-up ecosystem in Warsaw and Krakow rivals that of better-known Western European cities, driven by entrepreneurs who grew up watching their parents manage small businesses born from necessity.

For these entrepreneurs, resilience is second nature, and bootstrapping isn’t a cool tactic—it’s a family tradition.

Meanwhile, tiny Estonia, already famous for Skype, has turned digital citizenship into a pioneering export commodity. Its unicorn-per-capita rate is becoming an embarrassment of riches. Investors who once scratched their heads over how to find Tallinn on a map now scramble for Zoom calls with Estonian start-ups, hoping to buy into their next improbable success.

Entrepreneurship with attitude

Entrepreneurship in the CEE region isn’t merely about economic growth—it’s a rebellion against mediocrity.

Across Hungary, Bulgaria and Romania, ambitious tech-savvy youths see entrepreneurship as a way to avoid bureaucracy’s dreary grasp. Local start-up events look less like formal networking affairs and more like festivals celebrating defiance against convention, featuring DJs spinning beats alongside pitches about AI-driven agricultural drones or blockchain-based fashion.

Indeed, innovation in the region tends to be less about trendy Silicon Valley moonshots and more pragmatic. This is partly cultural: decades of shortages and rationing bred resourcefulness. Lithuanian fintech start-ups, for example, thrive precisely because they approach money transfers with a refreshing absence of drama—just efficient, cheap and boringly effective solutions to cross-border banking headaches.

It’s innovation stripped of Silicon Valley theatrics, innovation that simply works.

From coal mines to data mines: Sustainability pays

Investors keen on sustainability—once considered a luxury good in the region—have found surprising opportunities. While Europe’s eastern reaches long associated “green” initiatives with idealistic Westerners, today sustainability is a profitable niche rooted in practical necessity.

Take the Moravian-Silesian region in Czechia, historically a gritty coal-mining area. Today, it increasingly hosts clean-tech start-ups powered not just by the European Union’s generosity but by old-fashioned market logic: renewables, recycling and energy efficiency are simply becoming cheaper and more lucrative than dirty, coal-stained industries.

Poland’s coal miners might still protest loudly, but savvy investors are quietly placing bets on solar farms springing up on post-industrial wastelands.

Ukraine, too, despite being embroiled in a brutal conflict, views sustainability less as virtue signalling and more as strategic independence.

Its entrepreneurial class is betting heavily on energy tech as both patriotic necessity and future economic salvation—innovative battery storage solutions, modular housing, and green agriculture products crafted with export markets clearly in mind.

Winning the talent game

Investors betting on CEE have historically chased cheap labour, but today’s smart money is chasing talent—a far trickier beast.

The region boasts one of the world’s highest per-capita concentrations of science, tech and engineering graduates. But these bright sparks are increasingly aware of their worth and willing to bolt to Berlin, Amsterdam or London if undervalued.

Companies that succeed here understand that investment isn’t merely a financial exercise; it’s about nurturing culture and talent retention. Firms like UiPath in Romania, now a multi-billion-dollar automation unicorn, have cracked the talent code by making sure innovation isn’t confined to a shiny head office overseas but permeates local branches and development teams from Bucharest to Cluj.

The lesson? Talent is as mobile as capital—and far more sensitive to feeling valued.

Risks, but not as we knew them

Of course, CEE remains complex terrain. Democracy still stumbles occasionally, populists roar, bureaucracy resists change, and geopolitical shadows linger, most prominently those cast by Russia’s aggression in Ukraine.

Yet these risks are neither novel nor unique. What’s different now is the region’s institutional resilience and entrepreneurial defiance.

Smart investors understand that navigating this landscape requires more than number crunching—it demands cultural savvy, patience, and a sense of humour.

After all, anyone investing in a region famed for Kafkaesque bureaucracy quickly learns that the ability to laugh at absurdity is as essential as financial acumen.

Betting on reinvention

For investors looking East, the old clichés about post-communist drabness are becoming increasingly irrelevant. The region’s countries are busy rewriting their economic narratives, with local entrepreneurs proudly penning chapters filled with wit, grit and ambition.

The region’s investor pitch today might be summed up as follows: we may not be perfect, but we know how to reinvent ourselves better than most.

The CEE playbook no longer revolves around cheap labour or mass privatisations—it’s about nimble innovation, gritty entrepreneurs and sustainability driven not just by idealism but cold, calculated economics.

Old habits die fast in Central and Eastern Europe, and that might just be its greatest competitive advantage.

Photo by Adam Borkowski on Unsplash.

Marek Grzegorczyk

Marek Grzegorczyk

Marek Grzegorczyk is an analyst at Reinvantage.

Share

Case study: Global technology company

1. The Client

A global technology company operating across EMEA, with a regional HQ in Istanbul. The company manages 20+ markets, handling everything from brand campaigns to strategic partnerships.

Role we worked with: The EMEA Head of Marketing (supported by two regional managers).

2. The Challenge

Despite strong products and a respected global brand, the regional team was struggling with:

  • Misaligned strategy across markets → campaigns executed with inconsistent narratives.
  • Slowed growth → lead generation plateaued despite increasing spend.
  • Internal friction → marketing, sales, and product teams disagreed on KPIs and priorities.

Traditional fixes (more meetings, more reporting) only created more noise.

3. The Sprint

We ran a 10-day Remote Reinvention Sprint with the regional HQ team.

  • Day 1–3: Intake → Reviewed decks, campaign data, and plans.
  • Day 4: Sprint Session (90 mins) → Breakthroughs:
    • Sales and marketing had different definitions of “qualified lead.”
    • 40% of spend was going into low-potential markets.
    • The team assumed the problem was lack of budget, but it was actually lack of alignment.
  • Day 5–10: Synthesis → Insights distilled into a Clarity Brief + Insight Canvas.
4. The Breakthrough

The Sprint uncovered that the issue wasn’t budget, but fragmentation.
Three sharp insights unlocked a way forward:

  1. Unified KPIs bridging marketing + sales.
  2. Market prioritisation → shifting budget to 5 high-potential markets.
  3. Simplified narrative → one EMEA core story, locally adaptable.
By just realigning resources and focus, the client could unlock an estimated £250,000 in efficiency gains within the next 12 months — far exceeding the Sprint’s value guarantee. The path to higher returns was already inside the business, hidden by misalignment.
5. From Sprint to Action (4 Pillars Applied)

With clarity secured, Reinvantage didn’t suggest “more projects.”

Instead, we used the Sprint findings to create laser-focused next steps — drawing only from the areas that would deliver the most impact:

  • Readiness → Alignment workshops for sales + marketing teams. New playbooks clarified “qualified lead” definitions and reduced internal disputes.
  • Foresight → A market-opportunity scan identified which 5 countries would deliver the highest ROI, removing the guesswork from allocation.
  • Growth → Guided the reallocation of €2M budget and designed a phased rollout strategy that protected risk while maximising return.
  • Positioning → Built a messaging framework balancing global consistency with local nuance, ensuring campaigns spoke with one clear voice.

Because the Sprint had stripped away noise, these actions weren’t generic consulting ideas — they were directly tied to the breakthroughs.

6. The Results
  • +28% increase in qualified leads across the region.
  • 30% faster campaign rollout due to streamlined approvals.
  • Budget efficiency gains → €2M redirected from low-return to high-potential markets.
  • Internal cohesion → marketing + sales now use a single shared dashboard.
The client came in believing they needed more budget.
The Sprint revealed that what they really needed was clarity and alignment.

With that clarity, the four pillars became not theory, but practical tools to deliver measurable impact.

The Sprint guaranteed at least £20,000 in value — but in this case, it helped unlock more than 10x that within six months.

Case study: Regional VC fund & accelerator

1. The Client

A regional venture capital fund and accelerator focused on early-stage tech start-ups in the Baltics and Central Europe.

The fund had raised a new round and was under pressure to deliver stronger returns while also building its reputation as the go-to platform for founders.

Role we worked with: Managing Partner, supported by the Head of Portfolio Development.

2. The Challenge

Despite a promising portfolio, results were uneven.

Key issues:

  • Scattered portfolio support → no consistent playbook for start-ups, every partner did things differently.
  • Weak differentiation → founders and co-investors saw the fund as “one of many” in the region.
  • Stretched team → too many small bets, not enough clarity on which companies to double down on.

The leadership team knew something was off, but disagreed on whether the issue was pipeline quality, market conditions, or internal capacity.

3. The Sprint

We ran a 10-day Remote Reinvention Sprint with the partners and portfolio team.

  • Day 1–3: Intake → Reviewed pitch decks, pipeline funnel data, and start-up performance reports.
  • Day 4: Sprint Session (90 mins) → Breakthroughs:
    • No shared definition of a “high-potential founder.”
    • Support resources were spread too thin across the portfolio.
    • The fund’s positioning was more reactive than proactive — it didn’t own a distinctive narrative in the market.
  • Day 5–10: Synthesis → Insights consolidated into a Clarity Brief + Insight Canvas.
4. The Breakthrough

The Sprint revealed that the challenge wasn’t pipeline quality — it was lack of focus and positioning.

Three core insights provided the turning point:

  1. Portfolio Prioritisation Framework → defined clear criteria for where to double down.
  2. Founder Success Playbook → standardised support model for portfolio companies.
  3. Differentiated Narrative → repositioned the fund as “the accelerator of reinvention-ready founders.”
These shifts alone gave the fund a path to add an estimated £2M+ in portfolio value over the following 18 months, by concentrating capital and resources where they could move the needle most.
5. From Sprint to Action (4 Pillars Applied)

With clarity from the Sprint, Reinvantage created a tailored support plan:

  • Readiness → Coached partners on using the new prioritisation framework and trained the team on deploying the Founder Success Playbook.
  • Foresight → Ran scenario analysis on regional tech trends, helping the fund anticipate where capital would flow next.
  • Growth → Guided resource reallocation across the portfolio and supported new co-investor pitches for top-performing start-ups.
  • Positioning → Crafted a sharper brand story for the fund, positioning it as the reinvention partner for globally minded founders.
6. The Results
  • 10 portfolio companies onboarded to the new Playbook → greater consistency of support.
  • Raised follow-on capital for 3 top start-ups with the new prioritisation framework.
  • +26% increase in inbound deal flow from founders citing the fund’s new positioning.
  • Stronger internal cohesion → partners aligned on where to focus resources.
The client thought the problem was pipeline quality.
The Sprint showed it was actually lack of clarity and focus inside the firm.

By applying the four pillars, Reinvantage helped turn scattered effort into concentrated value creation.

The Sprint guaranteed at least £20,000 in value; here it set the stage for multi-million-pound upside in portfolio growth.

Case study: International impact Organisation

1. The Client

A large international impact organisation focused on entrepreneurship and economic empowerment.
The organisation runs multi-country programmes across Eastern Europe and Central Asia, often in partnership with global donors and corporate sponsors.

Role we worked with: Senior Programme Director, responsible for regional coordination.

2. The Challenge

The organisation had launched a flagship regional initiative supporting women entrepreneurs, but the programme was underperforming.

Key issues:

  • Fragmented delivery → each country office interpreted the programme differently.
  • Donor frustration → reporting lacked consistency and clear impact metrics.
  • Lost momentum → staff energy was spent on administration rather than scaling success stories.

Traditional programme reviews had produced long reports, but no real alignment or action.

3. The Sprint

We ran a 10-day Remote Reinvention Sprint with the regional leadership team and representatives from two country offices.

  • Day 1–3: Intake → Reviewed donor reports, programme KPIs, and field feedback.
  • Day 4: Sprint Session (90 mins) → Breakthroughs:
    • Donors cared about quantifiable outcomes, but reporting focused on stories.
    • Staff were duplicating efforts across countries, wasting time and resources.
    • The initiative lacked a clear theory of change — everyone described its purpose differently.
  • Day 5–10: Synthesis → Insights distilled into a Clarity Brief + Insight Canvas.
4. The Breakthrough

The Sprint revealed that the issue wasn’t donor pressure or programme design — it was a lack of shared framework and alignment.

Three critical insights reshaped the path forward:

  1. One Unified Theory of Change → agreed narrative for why the programme exists.
  2. Core Impact Metrics → clear, comparable KPIs across all countries.
  3. Smart Resource Sharing → digital hub to stop duplication and accelerate knowledge flow.
By eliminating duplicated reporting and clarifying what success looks like, the client saw they could save the equivalent of £100,000 in staff time annually — while also unlocking stronger donor confidence and follow-on funding opportunities.
5. From Sprint to Action (4 Pillars Applied)

Armed with Sprint clarity, Reinvantage proposed a laser-focused support plan:

  • Readiness → Trained programme leads on using the new metrics and integrated them into existing workflows.
  • Foresight → Analysed donor trends and expectations, aligning the initiative with the next funding cycle.
  • Growth → Developed a funding case based on the new unified theory of change, securing higher renewal chances.
  • Positioning → Crafted a regional success narrative and storytelling toolkit, helping them showcase results consistently across markets.
6. The Results
  • 30% less time spent on reporting → freed capacity for programme delivery.
  • Donor satisfaction improved → positive feedback on the clarity of impact evidence.
  • Secured new funding commitment → one major donor increased their contribution by 20%.
  • Stronger internal morale → staff felt they were working with clarity, not chaos.
The client thought it needed better donor management.
The Sprint revealed it needed a shared foundation across its teams.

By anchoring on the four pillars, Reinvantage turned alignment into efficiency gains and fresh funding opportunities.

The Sprint guaranteed at least £20,000 in value; here it unlocked both six-figure savings and future-proofed funding.

Case study: National digital development agency

1. The Client

A national digital development agency tasked with driving the government’s digital transformation agenda, including e-services, citizen portals, and smart city pilots.

Role we worked with: Director of Digital Transformation, supported by IT and service delivery leads from three ministries.

2. The Challenge

The agency had strong political backing but faced hurdles in implementation.

Key issues:

  • Siloed projects → each ministry developed digital tools independently, leading to duplication.
  • Citizen frustration → services were digital in name, but still required multiple logins and offline steps.
  • Funding pressure → international partners demanded clearer impact in the short term.

The agency wanted to accelerate momentum but struggled to get alignment across ministries.

3. The Sprint

We ran a 14-day Immersive Reinvention Sprint with the agency’s leadership and digital focal points from three ministries.

  • Day 1–3: Intake → Reviewed strategy docs, donor reports, and citizen feedback data.
  • Day 4: Immersive Sprint Session (half-day) → Breakthroughs:
    • Each ministry had different definitions of “digital service.”
    • 20% of budget was going into overlapping pilot projects.
    • Citizens’ top frustrations were known — but not prioritised.
  • Day 5–14: Synthesis → Insights consolidated into a Clarity Brief + Insight Canvas.
4. The Breakthrough

The Sprint revealed that the biggest blocker wasn’t lack of funding, but lack of shared priorities.

Three practical insights stood out:

  1. One Definition of Digital Service → agreed across ministries.
  2. Quick-Win Prioritisation → focus on top 3 citizen pain points (ID renewal, business registration, healthcare booking).
  3. Shared Resource Map → pool budgets to eliminate duplication.
These changes alone allowed the agency to unlock £75,000 in immediate savings and deliver 2–3 visible improvements in the next quarter — meeting donor expectations and building citizen trust.
5. From Sprint to Action (4 Pillars Applied)

Based on the Sprint clarity, Reinvantage proposed a modest, targeted package of support:

  • Readiness → Facilitated inter-ministerial workshops to embed the “one digital service” definition.
  • Foresight → Analysed citizen feedback trends to shape the quick-win roadmap.
  • Growth → Supported the reallocation of funds to joint projects, reducing overlap.
  • Positioning → Crafted a communication plan highlighting early digital wins to donors and citizens.
6. The Results
  • 2 pilot services integrated into the central portal (ID renewal + healthcare booking).
  • Budget savings of £75,000 from eliminating overlapping projects.
  • Citizen satisfaction up modestly → call centre complaints on digital services dropped by 12%.
  • Donor confidence improved → short-term impact report received positive feedback.
The client thought it needed more funding and bigger projects.
The Sprint revealed it first needed clarity and alignment.

By applying the four pillars to a targeted scope, Reinvantage helped deliver visible results within a single quarter — proving progress to citizens and donors and laying the groundwork for deeper transformation.