A woman stretches on a running track, performing a seated butterfly stretch for flexibility.
Don’t just prove, stretch
Rusting cargo ship docked at industrial port during sunset, symbolizing global supply chain breakdown
Supply chain seppuku
parallax background

Drying times

A global reckoning with drought's mounting toll

June 20, 2025

5 min read

June 20, 2025

5 min read

Photo: Dreamstime.

The rusting hulks of fishing boats sit marooned in what was once the Aral Sea, their keels now embedded in salt-crusted sand rather than lapping waves. These spectral vessels, scattered across the Aralkum desert, bear witness to one of the 20th century’s most staggering environmental catastrophes—the death of the world’s fourth-largest lake.

Though very much an entirely human phenomenon, the fate of the Aral Sea, which shrank from 68,000 square kilometres to virtually nothing within a generation, offers a sobering preview of a world increasingly gripped by drought. What began as Soviet agricultural ambition in the 1960s—diverting the Amu Darya and Syr Darya rivers to irrigate cotton fields—ended with the collapse of an entire ecosystem and the livelihoods of 3.5 million people.

The new normal

According to a new report from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), the global land area affected by drought has doubled in the last 120 years, whilst the economic costs of drought, which, on average, have at least doubled since 2000.

More ominously, an average drought in 2035 is projected to cost at least 35 per cent more than it would today.

The numbers paint a picture of a planet under mounting water stress. Some 40 per cent of the planet has experienced more frequent and intense droughts in recent decades due to climate change and human activity.

Under a four-degree warming scenario—a trajectory the world remains dangerously close to—droughts could become seven times more frequent and intense while occurring alongside other extremes such as heatwaves and wildfires.

Economic drought

The financial toll is already staggering. Globally, agriculture is the most affected sector, with crop yields declining by as much as 22 per cent during the driest years. This impacts supply chains, insurance markets, and government budgets with ruthless efficiency.

The OECD’s report highlights that the growing effects of drought are fuelled by multiple compounding factors, including deforestation, urban development, unsustainable farming and human-amplified climate change. This convergence of pressures transforms what were once manageable dry spells into economic catastrophes.

The United States offers a worthwile case study. Since 1980, drought and related crop failures have cost the American economy 249 billion US dollars, with several hundred billion US dollars in losses over the entire 20th-century. Australia, India, and other major agricultural producers have faced similar devastation.

The human cost

Beyond balance sheets, drought exacts a profound human toll. The World Economic Forum reports that droughts were the deadliest natural disaster globally between 1970 and 2019, killing 650,000 people despite representing only 15 per cent of natural disasters. Currently, 2.3 billion people—about a third of the world’s population—face water stress, a figure expected to double by 2050.

The Aral Sea’s former fishing ports tell this story in miniature. Commercial fishing catches plummeted from 43,430 tonnes in 1960 to zero by 1980 as salinity levels soared. The ports of Aral in the northeast and Mŭynoq in the south, once bustling centres of commerce, now sit stranded miles from the water’s edge.

Health impacts followed swiftly. Anemia cases increased twentyfold compared to 1960s statistics, whilst respiratory and intestinal ailments became endemic. The collapse forced a partial depopulation of areas along the lake’s former shoreline, with many residents abandoning homes that had sustained their families for generations.

Policy prescriptions

Effectively addressing the escalating drought threat, according to the OECD, requires a coordinated global response and decisive, proactive action from stakeholders. The organisation’s recommendations span technological innovation, policy reform, and international cooperation.

Building more efficient irrigation systems could significantly reduce global water use and expanding the number of drought-tolerant crops can help mitigate drought impacts and strengthen long-term climate change resilience. The report also emphasises the need for integrated water management, cross-sectoral action, investment in prevention rather than response, improved governance and data systems, and enhanced international cooperation.

Some regions offer glimmers of hope. Kazakhstan’s construction of the Kok-Aral Dam in 2005 helped revive the North Aral Sea’s water levels by 12 metres by 2008, enabling some fishing to resume. The project demonstrates that even severely degraded systems can begin to recover with sustained intervention and political will.

A drier tomorrow

Nevertheless, the scale of the challenge ahead dwarfs such local successes. By 2050, drought could affect more than 75 per cent of the world’s population, with 4.8 to 5.7 billion people living in areas with water shortages for at least one month annually. As many as 216 million people could be displaced from their homes at least partially due to prolonged dry weather.

The OECD’s analysis underscores an uncomfortable truth: drought is shifting from a periodic natural hazard to a persistent economic and social challenge. The transition demands a fundamental rethinking of how societies manage water, plan agriculture, and prepare for climate uncertainty.

Back in what remains of the Aral Sea basin, the lessons are written in salt and rust. The skeletal fishing boats serve as monuments to humanity’s capacity for environmental destruction—but also as urgent reminders of what awaits if the world fails to heed the early warnings.

As former UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon observed after visiting the region back in 2011, the Aral Sea’s fate represents “one of the planet’s worst environmental disasters”.

Whether it remains a unique catastrophe or becomes a template for the future may depend on choices made in the next decade.

Photo: Dreamstime.

Reinvantage Insight

Reinvantage Insight

The byline Reinvantage Insight is used to denote articles to which several members of the Reinvantage insight and analysis team may have contributed.

Share

Case study: Global technology company

1. The Client

A global technology company operating across EMEA, with a regional HQ in Istanbul. The company manages 20+ markets, handling everything from brand campaigns to strategic partnerships.

Role we worked with: The EMEA Head of Marketing (supported by two regional managers).

2. The Challenge

Despite strong products and a respected global brand, the regional team was struggling with:

  • Misaligned strategy across markets → campaigns executed with inconsistent narratives.
  • Slowed growth → lead generation plateaued despite increasing spend.
  • Internal friction → marketing, sales, and product teams disagreed on KPIs and priorities.

Traditional fixes (more meetings, more reporting) only created more noise.

3. The Sprint

We ran a 10-day Remote Reinvention Sprint with the regional HQ team.

  • Day 1–3: Intake → Reviewed decks, campaign data, and plans.
  • Day 4: Sprint Session (90 mins) → Breakthroughs:
    • Sales and marketing had different definitions of “qualified lead.”
    • 40% of spend was going into low-potential markets.
    • The team assumed the problem was lack of budget, but it was actually lack of alignment.
  • Day 5–10: Synthesis → Insights distilled into a Clarity Brief + Insight Canvas.
4. The Breakthrough

The Sprint uncovered that the issue wasn’t budget, but fragmentation.
Three sharp insights unlocked a way forward:

  1. Unified KPIs bridging marketing + sales.
  2. Market prioritisation → shifting budget to 5 high-potential markets.
  3. Simplified narrative → one EMEA core story, locally adaptable.
By just realigning resources and focus, the client could unlock an estimated £250,000 in efficiency gains within the next 12 months — far exceeding the Sprint’s value guarantee. The path to higher returns was already inside the business, hidden by misalignment.
5. From Sprint to Action (4 Pillars Applied)

With clarity secured, Reinvantage didn’t suggest “more projects.”

Instead, we used the Sprint findings to create laser-focused next steps — drawing only from the areas that would deliver the most impact:

  • Readiness → Alignment workshops for sales + marketing teams. New playbooks clarified “qualified lead” definitions and reduced internal disputes.
  • Foresight → A market-opportunity scan identified which 5 countries would deliver the highest ROI, removing the guesswork from allocation.
  • Growth → Guided the reallocation of €2M budget and designed a phased rollout strategy that protected risk while maximising return.
  • Positioning → Built a messaging framework balancing global consistency with local nuance, ensuring campaigns spoke with one clear voice.

Because the Sprint had stripped away noise, these actions weren’t generic consulting ideas — they were directly tied to the breakthroughs.

6. The Results
  • +28% increase in qualified leads across the region.
  • 30% faster campaign rollout due to streamlined approvals.
  • Budget efficiency gains → €2M redirected from low-return to high-potential markets.
  • Internal cohesion → marketing + sales now use a single shared dashboard.
The client came in believing they needed more budget.
The Sprint revealed that what they really needed was clarity and alignment.

With that clarity, the four pillars became not theory, but practical tools to deliver measurable impact.

The Sprint guaranteed at least £20,000 in value — but in this case, it helped unlock more than 10x that within six months.

Case study: Regional VC fund & accelerator

1. The Client

A regional venture capital fund and accelerator focused on early-stage tech start-ups in the Baltics and Central Europe.

The fund had raised a new round and was under pressure to deliver stronger returns while also building its reputation as the go-to platform for founders.

Role we worked with: Managing Partner, supported by the Head of Portfolio Development.

2. The Challenge

Despite a promising portfolio, results were uneven.

Key issues:

  • Scattered portfolio support → no consistent playbook for start-ups, every partner did things differently.
  • Weak differentiation → founders and co-investors saw the fund as “one of many” in the region.
  • Stretched team → too many small bets, not enough clarity on which companies to double down on.

The leadership team knew something was off, but disagreed on whether the issue was pipeline quality, market conditions, or internal capacity.

3. The Sprint

We ran a 10-day Remote Reinvention Sprint with the partners and portfolio team.

  • Day 1–3: Intake → Reviewed pitch decks, pipeline funnel data, and start-up performance reports.
  • Day 4: Sprint Session (90 mins) → Breakthroughs:
    • No shared definition of a “high-potential founder.”
    • Support resources were spread too thin across the portfolio.
    • The fund’s positioning was more reactive than proactive — it didn’t own a distinctive narrative in the market.
  • Day 5–10: Synthesis → Insights consolidated into a Clarity Brief + Insight Canvas.
4. The Breakthrough

The Sprint revealed that the challenge wasn’t pipeline quality — it was lack of focus and positioning.

Three core insights provided the turning point:

  1. Portfolio Prioritisation Framework → defined clear criteria for where to double down.
  2. Founder Success Playbook → standardised support model for portfolio companies.
  3. Differentiated Narrative → repositioned the fund as “the accelerator of reinvention-ready founders.”
These shifts alone gave the fund a path to add an estimated £2M+ in portfolio value over the following 18 months, by concentrating capital and resources where they could move the needle most.
5. From Sprint to Action (4 Pillars Applied)

With clarity from the Sprint, Reinvantage created a tailored support plan:

  • Readiness → Coached partners on using the new prioritisation framework and trained the team on deploying the Founder Success Playbook.
  • Foresight → Ran scenario analysis on regional tech trends, helping the fund anticipate where capital would flow next.
  • Growth → Guided resource reallocation across the portfolio and supported new co-investor pitches for top-performing start-ups.
  • Positioning → Crafted a sharper brand story for the fund, positioning it as the reinvention partner for globally minded founders.
6. The Results
  • 10 portfolio companies onboarded to the new Playbook → greater consistency of support.
  • Raised follow-on capital for 3 top start-ups with the new prioritisation framework.
  • +26% increase in inbound deal flow from founders citing the fund’s new positioning.
  • Stronger internal cohesion → partners aligned on where to focus resources.
The client thought the problem was pipeline quality.
The Sprint showed it was actually lack of clarity and focus inside the firm.

By applying the four pillars, Reinvantage helped turn scattered effort into concentrated value creation.

The Sprint guaranteed at least £20,000 in value; here it set the stage for multi-million-pound upside in portfolio growth.

Case study: International impact Organisation

1. The Client

A large international impact organisation focused on entrepreneurship and economic empowerment.
The organisation runs multi-country programmes across Eastern Europe and Central Asia, often in partnership with global donors and corporate sponsors.

Role we worked with: Senior Programme Director, responsible for regional coordination.

2. The Challenge

The organisation had launched a flagship regional initiative supporting women entrepreneurs, but the programme was underperforming.

Key issues:

  • Fragmented delivery → each country office interpreted the programme differently.
  • Donor frustration → reporting lacked consistency and clear impact metrics.
  • Lost momentum → staff energy was spent on administration rather than scaling success stories.

Traditional programme reviews had produced long reports, but no real alignment or action.

3. The Sprint

We ran a 10-day Remote Reinvention Sprint with the regional leadership team and representatives from two country offices.

  • Day 1–3: Intake → Reviewed donor reports, programme KPIs, and field feedback.
  • Day 4: Sprint Session (90 mins) → Breakthroughs:
    • Donors cared about quantifiable outcomes, but reporting focused on stories.
    • Staff were duplicating efforts across countries, wasting time and resources.
    • The initiative lacked a clear theory of change — everyone described its purpose differently.
  • Day 5–10: Synthesis → Insights distilled into a Clarity Brief + Insight Canvas.
4. The Breakthrough

The Sprint revealed that the issue wasn’t donor pressure or programme design — it was a lack of shared framework and alignment.

Three critical insights reshaped the path forward:

  1. One Unified Theory of Change → agreed narrative for why the programme exists.
  2. Core Impact Metrics → clear, comparable KPIs across all countries.
  3. Smart Resource Sharing → digital hub to stop duplication and accelerate knowledge flow.
By eliminating duplicated reporting and clarifying what success looks like, the client saw they could save the equivalent of £100,000 in staff time annually — while also unlocking stronger donor confidence and follow-on funding opportunities.
5. From Sprint to Action (4 Pillars Applied)

Armed with Sprint clarity, Reinvantage proposed a laser-focused support plan:

  • Readiness → Trained programme leads on using the new metrics and integrated them into existing workflows.
  • Foresight → Analysed donor trends and expectations, aligning the initiative with the next funding cycle.
  • Growth → Developed a funding case based on the new unified theory of change, securing higher renewal chances.
  • Positioning → Crafted a regional success narrative and storytelling toolkit, helping them showcase results consistently across markets.
6. The Results
  • 30% less time spent on reporting → freed capacity for programme delivery.
  • Donor satisfaction improved → positive feedback on the clarity of impact evidence.
  • Secured new funding commitment → one major donor increased their contribution by 20%.
  • Stronger internal morale → staff felt they were working with clarity, not chaos.
The client thought it needed better donor management.
The Sprint revealed it needed a shared foundation across its teams.

By anchoring on the four pillars, Reinvantage turned alignment into efficiency gains and fresh funding opportunities.

The Sprint guaranteed at least £20,000 in value; here it unlocked both six-figure savings and future-proofed funding.

Case study: National digital development agency

1. The Client

A national digital development agency tasked with driving the government’s digital transformation agenda, including e-services, citizen portals, and smart city pilots.

Role we worked with: Director of Digital Transformation, supported by IT and service delivery leads from three ministries.

2. The Challenge

The agency had strong political backing but faced hurdles in implementation.

Key issues:

  • Siloed projects → each ministry developed digital tools independently, leading to duplication.
  • Citizen frustration → services were digital in name, but still required multiple logins and offline steps.
  • Funding pressure → international partners demanded clearer impact in the short term.

The agency wanted to accelerate momentum but struggled to get alignment across ministries.

3. The Sprint

We ran a 14-day Immersive Reinvention Sprint with the agency’s leadership and digital focal points from three ministries.

  • Day 1–3: Intake → Reviewed strategy docs, donor reports, and citizen feedback data.
  • Day 4: Immersive Sprint Session (half-day) → Breakthroughs:
    • Each ministry had different definitions of “digital service.”
    • 20% of budget was going into overlapping pilot projects.
    • Citizens’ top frustrations were known — but not prioritised.
  • Day 5–14: Synthesis → Insights consolidated into a Clarity Brief + Insight Canvas.
4. The Breakthrough

The Sprint revealed that the biggest blocker wasn’t lack of funding, but lack of shared priorities.

Three practical insights stood out:

  1. One Definition of Digital Service → agreed across ministries.
  2. Quick-Win Prioritisation → focus on top 3 citizen pain points (ID renewal, business registration, healthcare booking).
  3. Shared Resource Map → pool budgets to eliminate duplication.
These changes alone allowed the agency to unlock £75,000 in immediate savings and deliver 2–3 visible improvements in the next quarter — meeting donor expectations and building citizen trust.
5. From Sprint to Action (4 Pillars Applied)

Based on the Sprint clarity, Reinvantage proposed a modest, targeted package of support:

  • Readiness → Facilitated inter-ministerial workshops to embed the “one digital service” definition.
  • Foresight → Analysed citizen feedback trends to shape the quick-win roadmap.
  • Growth → Supported the reallocation of funds to joint projects, reducing overlap.
  • Positioning → Crafted a communication plan highlighting early digital wins to donors and citizens.
6. The Results
  • 2 pilot services integrated into the central portal (ID renewal + healthcare booking).
  • Budget savings of £75,000 from eliminating overlapping projects.
  • Citizen satisfaction up modestly → call centre complaints on digital services dropped by 12%.
  • Donor confidence improved → short-term impact report received positive feedback.
The client thought it needed more funding and bigger projects.
The Sprint revealed it first needed clarity and alignment.

By applying the four pillars to a targeted scope, Reinvantage helped deliver visible results within a single quarter — proving progress to citizens and donors and laying the groundwork for deeper transformation.