Mechanic using a wrench to adjust engine parts on an extended workbench
The extended workbench breaks down
The headquarters of Rheinmetall, a German defense company whose stock is soaring due to increased European investment.
From pariah to profit
parallax background

Dacia felix

How a Romanian carmaker conquered Europe

June 26, 2025

11 min read

June 26, 2025

11 min read

The dashboard of a Dacia 1310. Photo: Dreamstime.

When the latest European car sales figures were released in January, they contained a quiet revelation. At the top of the charts was not a German saloon, Italian sports car, or French hatchback, but the Dacia Sandero—a budget box now largely built in Morocco that epitomises the very opposite of automotive aspiration.  

For those old enough to remember Dacia’s communist-era reputation, this achievement borders on the miraculous. 

Indeed, the transformation of Dacia from industrial basket case to European champion represents one of the most unlikely corporate turnarounds in modern history. It also serves as a compelling case study in how to successfully privatise a post-communist enterprise—a process that has yielded decidedly mixed results across much of Central and Eastern Europe. 

The promise of socialist progress

The Dacia began with the desperation of Romania’s communist leadership to establish a domestic automotive industry. In 1966, it founded Uzină de Autoturisme Pitești (UAP) and struck a licensing deal with Renault to produce cars locally.

The main factory was inaugurated in 1968 in Colibași (now Mioveni), near Pitești, around 100 kilometres northwest of Bucharest. The location was symbolic: the company took its name from the ancient kingdom of Dacia, which had once occupied much of present-day Romania before falling to Roman conquest in AD 106.  

The early years were promising. Starting with the Dacia 1100—a rebadged Renault 8 produced between 1968 and 1972—the company gradually built competence. The first Dacia 1300, based on the Renault 12, rolled off the production line in August 1969, ready for Romania’s then national holiday parade.  

In a remarkable PR coup, the identical car was simultaneously displayed at the Paris Motor Show, actually scooping Renault’s own launch of the model. 

Romanians were genuinely delighted with the 1300’s modernity and reliability. Here was a car that embodied the promise of socialist progress—affordable, practical, and built with contemporary western technology. Waiting lists were always lengthy, but this was seen as a mark of success rather than failure. The car dominated Romanian roads for decades, with over 2.5 million units produced across various iterations. 

The 1970s brought expansion and refinement. The 1300 (and its successor the 1310) spawned numerous variants: the luxurious 1301 LS reserved for officials, the practical Break estate, and even specialised versions like ambulances and pickups. There was even a Dacia 2000—based on the Renault 20—and later a sports car, the 1410 Sport.

But Dacia was not immune to Romania’s wider economic woes. By the mid 1980s, the gap between Dacia and international standards was embarrassingly obvious. As western automotive technology advanced rapidly, Romania’s economic problems deepened, and the cars stagnated. 

Dacia infelix

Indeed, Dacia’s troubles during the 1980s were legendary even by communist standards. The brand that had once symbolised socialist achievement became a byword for industrial failure. Older Romanians recall, apocryphally as much as anything, cars being delivered without key parts, while doors would fall off others.

The reality was probably worse than any myth. As Romania’s economy crumbled under the weight of Nicolae Ceaușescu’s misguided plan to repay the country’s foreign debt, industrial standards collapsed. Spare parts became scarce, maintenance was deferred, and workers—like everyone else—struggled with shortages of basic raw materials. The wait for a new Dacia, already a matter of several months, became a wait of several years.

Missing parts or not, the cars that eventually turned up reflected this decline: unreliable, poorly finished, and often outright dangerous. 

French revolution 

The 1989 revolution that toppled Ceaușescu left Dacia in a precarious position. The company had survived enormous political upheavals, but its future remained uncertain as Romania’s first post-communist governments stumbled their way, almost reluctantly, toward a market economy. For nearly a decade, the brand did little more than limp along, producing updated versions of the by now ancient 1310 and launching a newer model, the Nova, whilst searching for a credible partner. 

That partner turned out, again, to be Renault, which acquired a 51 per cent stake in Dacia in 1999, later increasing this to 99.3 per cent. The deal was far from obvious—Dacia was hardly an attractive proposition at the time. But Renault’s chairman, Louis Schweitzer, saw potential where others saw only problems.  

In Schweitzer’s view, the company had two considerable advantages: strong brand recognition within Romania, and a production facility offering skilled, motivated workers ready for a new challenge. 

Schweitzer’s strategic vision had been shaped by visits to Russia, where he observed that technically outdated Ladas priced at 6,000 US dollars were selling well with locals whilst 12,000 US dollars Renaults gathered dust in showrooms.  

“Seeing those antiquated cars, I found it unacceptable that technical progress should stop you making a good car for 6,000 US dollars,” he later recalled. 

Affordable, reliable

The insight was simple but profound: there was a vast global market for affordable, reliable cars that didn’t exist. Most manufacturers focused on adding features and increasing margins rather than stripping back to the essentials. Renault’s X90 project—which would become the Logan—represented a complete reversal of this logic. 

The Logan launched in 2004 after four years of development, revolutionising the industry by applying ‘design to cost’ methodology from the outset. Rather than building a car and then trying to reduce costs, the team optimised for price from the very beginning. This wasn’t cost-cutting; it was cost-engineering. 

The results were impressive. The Logan had 50 per cent fewer parts than a high-end Renault and limited electronic devices, making it cheaper to produce and easier to repair.  

Clever engineering touches included flatter windscreens to reduce manufacturing complexity, and single-piece injection-moulded dashboards that eliminated assembly costs. 

The suspension was deliberately soft and strong to handle poor road conditions common in Romania at the time (conditions still common, in some parts of the country, today), whilst the chassis sat higher than most compact cars to negotiate potholes.  

The engine was prepared to handle lower-quality fuel, and the air conditioning (an optional extra) was powerful enough to cope with extreme temperatures. Every detail reflected the needs of emerging markets rather than the preferences of wealthy Europeans. 

Romanian renaissance 

The Logan’s launch in Romania created scenes reminiscent of earlier consumer crazes. Schweitzer later recalled: “There were queues in front of the concessions, like at the cinema, and the Logans started selling like hotcakes”. The success was so great that Renault decided to launch the car in Western Europe, initially at a higher price point but still significantly cheaper than comparable models. 

The transformation was remarkable and rapid. Between 2004 and 2019, Dacia attracted 6.5 million customers and became the fifth-largest brand in terms of private sales in Europe. The Logan alone achieved over four million sales worldwide by 2018, proving that the appetite for honest, affordable motoring extended far beyond emerging markets. 

The formula proved endlessly adaptable. In 2008, the Sandero hatchback was launched, offering the Logan’s value in a more versatile package. The Duster SUV, launched in 2010, became the first crossover built by Dacia since the Renault acquisition, offering genuine off-road capability at a fraction of rivals’ premium prices. 

Each model maintained the brand’s core philosophy: maximum value with minimum frills. There were no heated steering wheels, no massage seats, no gesture-controlled sunroofs (at least not as standard). Instead, buyers got unfussy interiors, robust construction, and running costs that wouldn’t require a second mortgage. 

The success extended beyond Europe. Logan production was established in nine countries, from Morocco to India, Brazil to Iran. In each market, local assembly helped keep costs down whilst providing employment. The cars were sold under various badges—Renault in some markets, Nissan in others—but the underlying philosophy remained constant. 

This global expansion demonstrated the universality of Dacia’s value proposition. Whether driving Bucharest’s potholed streets, Casablanca’s dusty suburbs, or Mumbai’s chaotic traffic, customers wanted an affordable car that wouldn’t break down. The Logan family delivered exactly that, becoming one of the most successful automotive platforms of the 21st century. 

Close-up of the rear of a yellow Dacia Sandero, showing the distinctive Y-shaped LED taillight and the 'SANDERO' and 'DACIA' badges.
Photo: Dreamstime.
Beyond Dacia

Dacia’s transformation has been mirrored by Romania’s emergence as a significant European automotive hub. The country now ranks fourth in Central and Eastern European automotive production, behind only Czechia, Slovakia, and Poland. In 2023, Romania’s two main automotive plants—Dacia’s Mioveni facility and Ford’s Craiova operation—produced a record 513,050 vehicles, whilst the broader automotive industry contributes around 13 per cent of the country’s GDP and earns Romania more than 30 billion euros annually.

Ford’s Craiova plant, housed in the former Oltcit factory that Ford acquired in 2008, employs 6,000 people and produces the popular Puma and EcoSport SUVs alongside Transit commercial vehicles and advanced EcoBoost engines. Major suppliers including Bosch, Continental, and other international companies have established operations in Romania, and will soon be joined by BMW, whose BMW TechWorks Romania, which it is developing in cooperation with Japan’s NTT DATA, will become the hub for its European IT and software projects.

This industrial ecosystem employs approximately 180,000 people, making it one of Romania’s most important economic sectors. The success demonstrates how effective privatisation and foreign investment can transform entire industries, not just individual companies.

Romania has become proof that post-communist countries can compete successfully in high-value manufacturing when they combine skilled workforces, competitive costs, and strategic partnerships with established global players.

The man of the moment 

The architect of Dacia’s recent success is Denis Le Vot, who became the brand’s CEO in 2021. A Renault lifer who joined the company in 1990, Le Vot has held leadership roles across Europe, Turkey, Russia, and North America, including a stint as chairman of Nissan North America. 

Under his leadership, the Dacia brand has performed exceptionally well. Besides the Sandero now being Europe’s best-selling car, the Duster is the ninth. This success has not gone unnoticed: Le Vot is now considered a leading candidate to succeed Luca de Meo as Renault’s CEO. 

The possibility of a Dacia boss running the entire Renault Group would represent a delicious reversal of automotive hierarchy. It would also reflect the Romanian brand’s evolution from national embrassment to profit-generating powerhouse. 

Lessons in liberation 

Dacia’s transformation offers valuable insights into successful post-communist privatisation that border on best practice. Unlike the asset-stripping and corruption that characterised many privatisations, the Renault takeover represented a genuine industrial partnership. The French brought capital, technology, and management expertise whilst preserving local employment and manufacturing capacity. 

Crucially, Renault didn’t attempt to make Dacia something it wasn’t. Instead of trying to compete with BMW or Mercedes, the brand embraced its position as Europe’s bargain-basement option. This wasn’t a limitation but a liberation—freed from the need to match premium rivals on luxury or technology, Dacia could focus obsessively on value. 

The approach worked because it recognised a fundamental truth about European car buyers: many wanted reliable transport, not automotive status symbols.  

The Sandero’s success in Spain, Portugal, France, Italy, Belgium, Austria, and at home in Romania demonstrates the continent-wide appetite for no-nonsense motoring. 

A white Dacia Spring, an all-electric city car, is parked on a street in front of apartment buildings.
Dacia’s all-electric Spring. Photo: Dreamstime.
The open road ahead 

Some Romanians grumble that Dacia is no longer fully their own, but most are quietly proud and recognise that without Renault’s input the brand would be about as popular internationally as Lada.

Dacia’s achievement in making the Sandero Europe’s best-selling car in 2024 represents the summit of a remarkable journey that has redefined what success means in the automotive industry.

The brand’s triumph challenges the conventional wisdom that profit margins and prestige go hand in hand. Instead, Dacia has proved that volume and value can be equally rewarding. 

The success has broader implications for the automotive industry as it grapples with electrification, digitalisation, and changing consumer preferences. Whilst premium manufacturers chase ever-more sophisticated technology, Dacia’s approach suggests that many customers still want nothing more than affordable, reliable cars.  

This insight becomes particularly relevant as electric vehicles remain expensive and charging infrastructure patchy—conditions that mirror the emerging markets where Dacia first proved its worth.  

The brand’s evolution from communist catastrophe to capitalist champion also illustrates the enduring appeal of democratic markets over state planning. Where communist central planning produced unreliable cars that nobody wanted to buy (unless they had no other choice), market forces and private ownership created vehicles that millions of Europeans actively choose to purchase.

As other post-communist enterprises continue to struggle with the transition to market economics, Dacia is proof that transformation, even reinvention, is possible when the right conditions align. The Romanian carmaker succeeded not through superior engineering or revolutionary design, but by understanding its market position and executing ruthlessly within those constraints. 

The challenge now is maintaining this success as the automotive landscape shifts toward electrification. Dacia launched the Spring, Europe’s cheapest electric vehicle, in 2021, suggesting the brand understands that its future lies in democratising new technologies rather than perfecting old ones. More than 150,000 Springs have been sold since its launch. 

If the company can push on—applying value engineering to electric powertrains as successfully as it did to conventional cars—the next chapter of the Dacia story may be even more remarkable than the last. 

The dashboard of a Dacia 1310. Photo: Dreamstime.

Craig Turp-Balazs

Craig Turp-Balazs

Craig Turp-Balazs is head of insight and analysis at Reinvantage.

Share

Case study: Global technology company

1. The Client

A global technology company operating across EMEA, with a regional HQ in Istanbul. The company manages 20+ markets, handling everything from brand campaigns to strategic partnerships.

Role we worked with: The EMEA Head of Marketing (supported by two regional managers).

2. The Challenge

Despite strong products and a respected global brand, the regional team was struggling with:

  • Misaligned strategy across markets → campaigns executed with inconsistent narratives.
  • Slowed growth → lead generation plateaued despite increasing spend.
  • Internal friction → marketing, sales, and product teams disagreed on KPIs and priorities.

Traditional fixes (more meetings, more reporting) only created more noise.

3. The Sprint

We ran a 10-day Remote Reinvention Sprint with the regional HQ team.

  • Day 1–3: Intake → Reviewed decks, campaign data, and plans.
  • Day 4: Sprint Session (90 mins) → Breakthroughs:
    • Sales and marketing had different definitions of “qualified lead.”
    • 40% of spend was going into low-potential markets.
    • The team assumed the problem was lack of budget, but it was actually lack of alignment.
  • Day 5–10: Synthesis → Insights distilled into a Clarity Brief + Insight Canvas.
4. The Breakthrough

The Sprint uncovered that the issue wasn’t budget, but fragmentation.
Three sharp insights unlocked a way forward:

  1. Unified KPIs bridging marketing + sales.
  2. Market prioritisation → shifting budget to 5 high-potential markets.
  3. Simplified narrative → one EMEA core story, locally adaptable.
By just realigning resources and focus, the client could unlock an estimated £250,000 in efficiency gains within the next 12 months — far exceeding the Sprint’s value guarantee. The path to higher returns was already inside the business, hidden by misalignment.
5. From Sprint to Action (4 Pillars Applied)

With clarity secured, Reinvantage didn’t suggest “more projects.”

Instead, we used the Sprint findings to create laser-focused next steps — drawing only from the areas that would deliver the most impact:

  • Readiness → Alignment workshops for sales + marketing teams. New playbooks clarified “qualified lead” definitions and reduced internal disputes.
  • Foresight → A market-opportunity scan identified which 5 countries would deliver the highest ROI, removing the guesswork from allocation.
  • Growth → Guided the reallocation of €2M budget and designed a phased rollout strategy that protected risk while maximising return.
  • Positioning → Built a messaging framework balancing global consistency with local nuance, ensuring campaigns spoke with one clear voice.

Because the Sprint had stripped away noise, these actions weren’t generic consulting ideas — they were directly tied to the breakthroughs.

6. The Results
  • +28% increase in qualified leads across the region.
  • 30% faster campaign rollout due to streamlined approvals.
  • Budget efficiency gains → €2M redirected from low-return to high-potential markets.
  • Internal cohesion → marketing + sales now use a single shared dashboard.
The client came in believing they needed more budget.
The Sprint revealed that what they really needed was clarity and alignment.

With that clarity, the four pillars became not theory, but practical tools to deliver measurable impact.

The Sprint guaranteed at least £20,000 in value — but in this case, it helped unlock more than 10x that within six months.

Case study: Regional VC fund & accelerator

1. The Client

A regional venture capital fund and accelerator focused on early-stage tech start-ups in the Baltics and Central Europe.

The fund had raised a new round and was under pressure to deliver stronger returns while also building its reputation as the go-to platform for founders.

Role we worked with: Managing Partner, supported by the Head of Portfolio Development.

2. The Challenge

Despite a promising portfolio, results were uneven.

Key issues:

  • Scattered portfolio support → no consistent playbook for start-ups, every partner did things differently.
  • Weak differentiation → founders and co-investors saw the fund as “one of many” in the region.
  • Stretched team → too many small bets, not enough clarity on which companies to double down on.

The leadership team knew something was off, but disagreed on whether the issue was pipeline quality, market conditions, or internal capacity.

3. The Sprint

We ran a 10-day Remote Reinvention Sprint with the partners and portfolio team.

  • Day 1–3: Intake → Reviewed pitch decks, pipeline funnel data, and start-up performance reports.
  • Day 4: Sprint Session (90 mins) → Breakthroughs:
    • No shared definition of a “high-potential founder.”
    • Support resources were spread too thin across the portfolio.
    • The fund’s positioning was more reactive than proactive — it didn’t own a distinctive narrative in the market.
  • Day 5–10: Synthesis → Insights consolidated into a Clarity Brief + Insight Canvas.
4. The Breakthrough

The Sprint revealed that the challenge wasn’t pipeline quality — it was lack of focus and positioning.

Three core insights provided the turning point:

  1. Portfolio Prioritisation Framework → defined clear criteria for where to double down.
  2. Founder Success Playbook → standardised support model for portfolio companies.
  3. Differentiated Narrative → repositioned the fund as “the accelerator of reinvention-ready founders.”
These shifts alone gave the fund a path to add an estimated £2M+ in portfolio value over the following 18 months, by concentrating capital and resources where they could move the needle most.
5. From Sprint to Action (4 Pillars Applied)

With clarity from the Sprint, Reinvantage created a tailored support plan:

  • Readiness → Coached partners on using the new prioritisation framework and trained the team on deploying the Founder Success Playbook.
  • Foresight → Ran scenario analysis on regional tech trends, helping the fund anticipate where capital would flow next.
  • Growth → Guided resource reallocation across the portfolio and supported new co-investor pitches for top-performing start-ups.
  • Positioning → Crafted a sharper brand story for the fund, positioning it as the reinvention partner for globally minded founders.
6. The Results
  • 10 portfolio companies onboarded to the new Playbook → greater consistency of support.
  • Raised follow-on capital for 3 top start-ups with the new prioritisation framework.
  • +26% increase in inbound deal flow from founders citing the fund’s new positioning.
  • Stronger internal cohesion → partners aligned on where to focus resources.
The client thought the problem was pipeline quality.
The Sprint showed it was actually lack of clarity and focus inside the firm.

By applying the four pillars, Reinvantage helped turn scattered effort into concentrated value creation.

The Sprint guaranteed at least £20,000 in value; here it set the stage for multi-million-pound upside in portfolio growth.

Case study: International impact Organisation

1. The Client

A large international impact organisation focused on entrepreneurship and economic empowerment.
The organisation runs multi-country programmes across Eastern Europe and Central Asia, often in partnership with global donors and corporate sponsors.

Role we worked with: Senior Programme Director, responsible for regional coordination.

2. The Challenge

The organisation had launched a flagship regional initiative supporting women entrepreneurs, but the programme was underperforming.

Key issues:

  • Fragmented delivery → each country office interpreted the programme differently.
  • Donor frustration → reporting lacked consistency and clear impact metrics.
  • Lost momentum → staff energy was spent on administration rather than scaling success stories.

Traditional programme reviews had produced long reports, but no real alignment or action.

3. The Sprint

We ran a 10-day Remote Reinvention Sprint with the regional leadership team and representatives from two country offices.

  • Day 1–3: Intake → Reviewed donor reports, programme KPIs, and field feedback.
  • Day 4: Sprint Session (90 mins) → Breakthroughs:
    • Donors cared about quantifiable outcomes, but reporting focused on stories.
    • Staff were duplicating efforts across countries, wasting time and resources.
    • The initiative lacked a clear theory of change — everyone described its purpose differently.
  • Day 5–10: Synthesis → Insights distilled into a Clarity Brief + Insight Canvas.
4. The Breakthrough

The Sprint revealed that the issue wasn’t donor pressure or programme design — it was a lack of shared framework and alignment.

Three critical insights reshaped the path forward:

  1. One Unified Theory of Change → agreed narrative for why the programme exists.
  2. Core Impact Metrics → clear, comparable KPIs across all countries.
  3. Smart Resource Sharing → digital hub to stop duplication and accelerate knowledge flow.
By eliminating duplicated reporting and clarifying what success looks like, the client saw they could save the equivalent of £100,000 in staff time annually — while also unlocking stronger donor confidence and follow-on funding opportunities.
5. From Sprint to Action (4 Pillars Applied)

Armed with Sprint clarity, Reinvantage proposed a laser-focused support plan:

  • Readiness → Trained programme leads on using the new metrics and integrated them into existing workflows.
  • Foresight → Analysed donor trends and expectations, aligning the initiative with the next funding cycle.
  • Growth → Developed a funding case based on the new unified theory of change, securing higher renewal chances.
  • Positioning → Crafted a regional success narrative and storytelling toolkit, helping them showcase results consistently across markets.
6. The Results
  • 30% less time spent on reporting → freed capacity for programme delivery.
  • Donor satisfaction improved → positive feedback on the clarity of impact evidence.
  • Secured new funding commitment → one major donor increased their contribution by 20%.
  • Stronger internal morale → staff felt they were working with clarity, not chaos.
The client thought it needed better donor management.
The Sprint revealed it needed a shared foundation across its teams.

By anchoring on the four pillars, Reinvantage turned alignment into efficiency gains and fresh funding opportunities.

The Sprint guaranteed at least £20,000 in value; here it unlocked both six-figure savings and future-proofed funding.

Case study: National digital development agency

1. The Client

A national digital development agency tasked with driving the government’s digital transformation agenda, including e-services, citizen portals, and smart city pilots.

Role we worked with: Director of Digital Transformation, supported by IT and service delivery leads from three ministries.

2. The Challenge

The agency had strong political backing but faced hurdles in implementation.

Key issues:

  • Siloed projects → each ministry developed digital tools independently, leading to duplication.
  • Citizen frustration → services were digital in name, but still required multiple logins and offline steps.
  • Funding pressure → international partners demanded clearer impact in the short term.

The agency wanted to accelerate momentum but struggled to get alignment across ministries.

3. The Sprint

We ran a 14-day Immersive Reinvention Sprint with the agency’s leadership and digital focal points from three ministries.

  • Day 1–3: Intake → Reviewed strategy docs, donor reports, and citizen feedback data.
  • Day 4: Immersive Sprint Session (half-day) → Breakthroughs:
    • Each ministry had different definitions of “digital service.”
    • 20% of budget was going into overlapping pilot projects.
    • Citizens’ top frustrations were known — but not prioritised.
  • Day 5–14: Synthesis → Insights consolidated into a Clarity Brief + Insight Canvas.
4. The Breakthrough

The Sprint revealed that the biggest blocker wasn’t lack of funding, but lack of shared priorities.

Three practical insights stood out:

  1. One Definition of Digital Service → agreed across ministries.
  2. Quick-Win Prioritisation → focus on top 3 citizen pain points (ID renewal, business registration, healthcare booking).
  3. Shared Resource Map → pool budgets to eliminate duplication.
These changes alone allowed the agency to unlock £75,000 in immediate savings and deliver 2–3 visible improvements in the next quarter — meeting donor expectations and building citizen trust.
5. From Sprint to Action (4 Pillars Applied)

Based on the Sprint clarity, Reinvantage proposed a modest, targeted package of support:

  • Readiness → Facilitated inter-ministerial workshops to embed the “one digital service” definition.
  • Foresight → Analysed citizen feedback trends to shape the quick-win roadmap.
  • Growth → Supported the reallocation of funds to joint projects, reducing overlap.
  • Positioning → Crafted a communication plan highlighting early digital wins to donors and citizens.
6. The Results
  • 2 pilot services integrated into the central portal (ID renewal + healthcare booking).
  • Budget savings of £75,000 from eliminating overlapping projects.
  • Citizen satisfaction up modestly → call centre complaints on digital services dropped by 12%.
  • Donor confidence improved → short-term impact report received positive feedback.
The client thought it needed more funding and bigger projects.
The Sprint revealed it first needed clarity and alignment.

By applying the four pillars to a targeted scope, Reinvantage helped deliver visible results within a single quarter — proving progress to citizens and donors and laying the groundwork for deeper transformation.