Grid lock
parallax background

Neither here nor there

The pull of larger capital markets is robbing CESEE of its unicorns

March 24, 2026

5 min read

March 24, 2026

5 min read

Photo: Dreamstime.

Estonia has a population of 1.4 million. By the metrics that Silicon Valley uses to measure itself, that is smaller than most of its portfolio companies. And yet Estonia is home to ten unicorn companies (start-ups valued at over one billion US dollars), a density of 7.3 per million inhabitants that no country on earth can match. Wise, the payments platform, is worth 13 billion US dollars. Bolt, the ridesharing company, emerged from the same ferment that produced Skype, which in turn bankrolled many of the founders who built both. The virtuous cycle is real, and it has made a country the size of a mid-sized American city into one of the world’s most productive start-up launchpads.

The catch, as a new report from the Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies (wiiw) makes plain, is that while high-density hubs such as Estonia (as well as Lithuania and Croatia) prove that innovation can spark anywhere, the path to becoming a global giant often still leads westward, even as the R&D roots remain firmly planted in the region. 

Between 2008 and 2021, nearly 30 per cent of European unicorns relocated their headquarters abroad. The pattern holds across Central, East and Southeast Europe (CESEE): the region builds companies that the rest of the world claims. It is, in the language of development economics, a brain drain with particularly good branding.

The wiiw analysis, which draws on Eurostat’s Structural Business Statistics and patent data from the OECD, maps the sectoral structure of small firms across the region — companies with between ten and 49 employees that are, by and large, mature start-ups approaching the inflection point where growth requires either deep capital or relocation. What it reveals is extraordinary patchwork: a handful of urban clusters generating almost all of the region’s innovation value, the territory surrounding them barely registering.

Prague accounts for more than 80 per cent of Czechia’s total start-up enterprise value. Vilnius dominates Lithuania’s innovation landscape to a comparable degree. Warsaw, for all Poland’s scale (the country hosts 14 unicorns, the most in the region) ranked only 91st in StartupBlink’s global city index for 2025, a measure of ecosystem vitality rather than sheer bulk. Poland’s strength lies in its breadth, not its peaks.

Sector by sector

The sector of the moment is digital. According to Eurostat, CESEE’s digital economy sector grew at an average annual rate of 5.6 per cent between 2021 and 2024, outpacing every other sector in both the short and medium term. Croatia, home to Infobip, the cloud-communications unicorn, has been among the fastest-growing digital markets in the region. Serbia’s figures (partly a statistical artefact of a very low base) show a short-term growth rate in digital economy small firms of 475.7 per cent, which is either spectacular or terrifying depending on where you sit.

Production, by contrast, is in trouble. Export-oriented manufacturing across CESEE contracted 1.5 per cent in the year to 2024 and has been shrinking at 2.5 per cent annually since 2021. The wiiw analysts point to the US trade war as a proximate cause, though the structural problems (ageing workforces, wage pressures, rising energy costs) were building long before tariffs entered the equation.

Life sciences tells a more nuanced story. The sector is small, just 10,116 small firms across the region, accounting for 3.3 per cent of the total, but the patent data reveals something the firm counts obscure. Lithuania, despite generating modest patent volumes in absolute terms, directs more than 10 per cent of its total patent activity towards biotechnology. Estonia leads CESEE in AI-related patents as a share of its overall portfolio. 

The dual-hub model

The uncomfortable question hanging over this is what do you do with a region that is brilliant at starting things and poor at scaling them?

The answer the wiiw report proposes is Vienna. The Austrian capital ranked 74th in the StartupBlink global ecosystem index for 2025, up nine places from the previous year, with ecosystem growth of 27.1 per cent. It sits inside the World Intellectual Property Organization’s top 100 innovation clusters. It has research universities, financial infrastructure, and (the selling point the report leans on most) geographic and cultural proximity to the rest of CESEE. A Croatian deep-tech firm seeking Western European capital has a shorter journey, logistically and culturally, to Vienna than to London.

The dual-hub model the wiiw researchers advocate is not new. Silicon Valley has practised it for decades: engineering teams in Warsaw or Bangalore, headquarters in Palo Alto. What is new is the suggestion that this arbitrage can work within the EU, and that keeping value inside the bloc is worth engineering deliberately. A halfway house, in other words, rather than emigration.

Whether Vienna can carry that weight is another matter. The deeper problem the wiiw report documents, such as fragmented capital markets, absent late-stage venture funding, no pan-European equivalent of Nasdaq, will not be resolved by encouraging a few hundred start-ups to open satellite offices in the first district. Mario Draghi’s preferred remedy, the Capital Markets Union, remains more ambition than architecture.

Lithuania offers a more instructive glimpse of what regional success can look like. Its Vilnius-centred ecosystem has been the fastest-growing in CESEE since 2020, nearly sextupling in value and producing winners in cybersecurity and digital marketplaces, most notably Nord Security. Poland has built a formidable creative economy on gaming (CD Projekt, Techland, Huuuge Games) and ElevenLabs, a Polish-founded AI voice company now headquartered in London, reached a 6.6 billion US dollars valuation this year. The region can produce world-class companies.

Nevertheless, as wiiw concludes, in the absence of fully realised Capital Markets Union reforms, regional innovation corridors may represent the most immediately actionable mechanism to address Europe’s scaling challenge.

Designing these corridors intentionally could transform CESEE’s concentrated innovation strength into sustained, EU-wide competitiveness.

Photo: Dreamstime.

Reinvantage Insight

Reinvantage Insight

The byline Reinvantage Insight is used to denote articles to which several members of the Reinvantage insight and analysis team may have contributed.

Share

Case study: Global technology company

1. The Client

A global technology company operating across EMEA, with a regional HQ in Istanbul. The company manages 20+ markets, handling everything from brand campaigns to strategic partnerships.

Role we worked with: The EMEA Head of Marketing (supported by two regional managers).

2. The Challenge

Despite strong products and a respected global brand, the regional team was struggling with:

  • Misaligned strategy across markets → campaigns executed with inconsistent narratives.
  • Slowed growth → lead generation plateaued despite increasing spend.
  • Internal friction → marketing, sales, and product teams disagreed on KPIs and priorities.

Traditional fixes (more meetings, more reporting) only created more noise.

3. The Sprint

We ran a 10-day Remote Reinvention Sprint with the regional HQ team.

  • Day 1–3: Intake → Reviewed decks, campaign data, and plans.
  • Day 4: Sprint Session (90 mins) → Breakthroughs:
    • Sales and marketing had different definitions of “qualified lead.”
    • 40% of spend was going into low-potential markets.
    • The team assumed the problem was lack of budget, but it was actually lack of alignment.
  • Day 5–10: Synthesis → Insights distilled into a Clarity Brief + Insight Canvas.
4. The Breakthrough

The Sprint uncovered that the issue wasn’t budget, but fragmentation.
Three sharp insights unlocked a way forward:

  1. Unified KPIs bridging marketing + sales.
  2. Market prioritisation → shifting budget to 5 high-potential markets.
  3. Simplified narrative → one EMEA core story, locally adaptable.
By just realigning resources and focus, the client could unlock an estimated £250,000 in efficiency gains within the next 12 months — far exceeding the Sprint’s value guarantee. The path to higher returns was already inside the business, hidden by misalignment.
5. From Sprint to Action (4 Pillars Applied)

With clarity secured, Reinvantage didn’t suggest “more projects.”

Instead, we used the Sprint findings to create laser-focused next steps — drawing only from the areas that would deliver the most impact:

  • Readiness → Alignment workshops for sales + marketing teams. New playbooks clarified “qualified lead” definitions and reduced internal disputes.
  • Foresight → A market-opportunity scan identified which 5 countries would deliver the highest ROI, removing the guesswork from allocation.
  • Growth → Guided the reallocation of €2M budget and designed a phased rollout strategy that protected risk while maximising return.
  • Positioning → Built a messaging framework balancing global consistency with local nuance, ensuring campaigns spoke with one clear voice.

Because the Sprint had stripped away noise, these actions weren’t generic consulting ideas — they were directly tied to the breakthroughs.

6. The Results
  • +28% increase in qualified leads across the region.
  • 30% faster campaign rollout due to streamlined approvals.
  • Budget efficiency gains → €2M redirected from low-return to high-potential markets.
  • Internal cohesion → marketing + sales now use a single shared dashboard.
The client came in believing they needed more budget.
The Sprint revealed that what they really needed was clarity and alignment.

With that clarity, the four pillars became not theory, but practical tools to deliver measurable impact.

The Sprint guaranteed at least £20,000 in value — but in this case, it helped unlock more than 10x that within six months.

Case study: Regional VC fund & accelerator

1. The Client

A regional venture capital fund and accelerator focused on early-stage tech start-ups in the Baltics and Central Europe.

The fund had raised a new round and was under pressure to deliver stronger returns while also building its reputation as the go-to platform for founders.

Role we worked with: Managing Partner, supported by the Head of Portfolio Development.

2. The Challenge

Despite a promising portfolio, results were uneven.

Key issues:

  • Scattered portfolio support → no consistent playbook for start-ups, every partner did things differently.
  • Weak differentiation → founders and co-investors saw the fund as “one of many” in the region.
  • Stretched team → too many small bets, not enough clarity on which companies to double down on.

The leadership team knew something was off, but disagreed on whether the issue was pipeline quality, market conditions, or internal capacity.

3. The Sprint

We ran a 10-day Remote Reinvention Sprint with the partners and portfolio team.

  • Day 1–3: Intake → Reviewed pitch decks, pipeline funnel data, and start-up performance reports.
  • Day 4: Sprint Session (90 mins) → Breakthroughs:
    • No shared definition of a “high-potential founder.”
    • Support resources were spread too thin across the portfolio.
    • The fund’s positioning was more reactive than proactive — it didn’t own a distinctive narrative in the market.
  • Day 5–10: Synthesis → Insights consolidated into a Clarity Brief + Insight Canvas.
4. The Breakthrough

The Sprint revealed that the challenge wasn’t pipeline quality — it was lack of focus and positioning.

Three core insights provided the turning point:

  1. Portfolio Prioritisation Framework → defined clear criteria for where to double down.
  2. Founder Success Playbook → standardised support model for portfolio companies.
  3. Differentiated Narrative → repositioned the fund as “the accelerator of reinvention-ready founders.”
These shifts alone gave the fund a path to add an estimated £2M+ in portfolio value over the following 18 months, by concentrating capital and resources where they could move the needle most.
5. From Sprint to Action (4 Pillars Applied)

With clarity from the Sprint, Reinvantage created a tailored support plan:

  • Readiness → Coached partners on using the new prioritisation framework and trained the team on deploying the Founder Success Playbook.
  • Foresight → Ran scenario analysis on regional tech trends, helping the fund anticipate where capital would flow next.
  • Growth → Guided resource reallocation across the portfolio and supported new co-investor pitches for top-performing start-ups.
  • Positioning → Crafted a sharper brand story for the fund, positioning it as the reinvention partner for globally minded founders.
6. The Results
  • 10 portfolio companies onboarded to the new Playbook → greater consistency of support.
  • Raised follow-on capital for 3 top start-ups with the new prioritisation framework.
  • +26% increase in inbound deal flow from founders citing the fund’s new positioning.
  • Stronger internal cohesion → partners aligned on where to focus resources.
The client thought the problem was pipeline quality.
The Sprint showed it was actually lack of clarity and focus inside the firm.

By applying the four pillars, Reinvantage helped turn scattered effort into concentrated value creation.

The Sprint guaranteed at least £20,000 in value; here it set the stage for multi-million-pound upside in portfolio growth.

Case study: International impact Organisation

1. The Client

A large international impact organisation focused on entrepreneurship and economic empowerment.
The organisation runs multi-country programmes across Eastern Europe and Central Asia, often in partnership with global donors and corporate sponsors.

Role we worked with: Senior Programme Director, responsible for regional coordination.

2. The Challenge

The organisation had launched a flagship regional initiative supporting women entrepreneurs, but the programme was underperforming.

Key issues:

  • Fragmented delivery → each country office interpreted the programme differently.
  • Donor frustration → reporting lacked consistency and clear impact metrics.
  • Lost momentum → staff energy was spent on administration rather than scaling success stories.

Traditional programme reviews had produced long reports, but no real alignment or action.

3. The Sprint

We ran a 10-day Remote Reinvention Sprint with the regional leadership team and representatives from two country offices.

  • Day 1–3: Intake → Reviewed donor reports, programme KPIs, and field feedback.
  • Day 4: Sprint Session (90 mins) → Breakthroughs:
    • Donors cared about quantifiable outcomes, but reporting focused on stories.
    • Staff were duplicating efforts across countries, wasting time and resources.
    • The initiative lacked a clear theory of change — everyone described its purpose differently.
  • Day 5–10: Synthesis → Insights distilled into a Clarity Brief + Insight Canvas.
4. The Breakthrough

The Sprint revealed that the issue wasn’t donor pressure or programme design — it was a lack of shared framework and alignment.

Three critical insights reshaped the path forward:

  1. One Unified Theory of Change → agreed narrative for why the programme exists.
  2. Core Impact Metrics → clear, comparable KPIs across all countries.
  3. Smart Resource Sharing → digital hub to stop duplication and accelerate knowledge flow.
By eliminating duplicated reporting and clarifying what success looks like, the client saw they could save the equivalent of £100,000 in staff time annually — while also unlocking stronger donor confidence and follow-on funding opportunities.
5. From Sprint to Action (4 Pillars Applied)

Armed with Sprint clarity, Reinvantage proposed a laser-focused support plan:

  • Readiness → Trained programme leads on using the new metrics and integrated them into existing workflows.
  • Foresight → Analysed donor trends and expectations, aligning the initiative with the next funding cycle.
  • Growth → Developed a funding case based on the new unified theory of change, securing higher renewal chances.
  • Positioning → Crafted a regional success narrative and storytelling toolkit, helping them showcase results consistently across markets.
6. The Results
  • 30% less time spent on reporting → freed capacity for programme delivery.
  • Donor satisfaction improved → positive feedback on the clarity of impact evidence.
  • Secured new funding commitment → one major donor increased their contribution by 20%.
  • Stronger internal morale → staff felt they were working with clarity, not chaos.
The client thought it needed better donor management.
The Sprint revealed it needed a shared foundation across its teams.

By anchoring on the four pillars, Reinvantage turned alignment into efficiency gains and fresh funding opportunities.

The Sprint guaranteed at least £20,000 in value; here it unlocked both six-figure savings and future-proofed funding.

Case study: National digital development agency

1. The Client

A national digital development agency tasked with driving the government’s digital transformation agenda, including e-services, citizen portals, and smart city pilots.

Role we worked with: Director of Digital Transformation, supported by IT and service delivery leads from three ministries.

2. The Challenge

The agency had strong political backing but faced hurdles in implementation.

Key issues:

  • Siloed projects → each ministry developed digital tools independently, leading to duplication.
  • Citizen frustration → services were digital in name, but still required multiple logins and offline steps.
  • Funding pressure → international partners demanded clearer impact in the short term.

The agency wanted to accelerate momentum but struggled to get alignment across ministries.

3. The Sprint

We ran a 14-day Immersive Reinvention Sprint with the agency’s leadership and digital focal points from three ministries.

  • Day 1–3: Intake → Reviewed strategy docs, donor reports, and citizen feedback data.
  • Day 4: Immersive Sprint Session (half-day) → Breakthroughs:
    • Each ministry had different definitions of “digital service.”
    • 20% of budget was going into overlapping pilot projects.
    • Citizens’ top frustrations were known — but not prioritised.
  • Day 5–14: Synthesis → Insights consolidated into a Clarity Brief + Insight Canvas.
4. The Breakthrough

The Sprint revealed that the biggest blocker wasn’t lack of funding, but lack of shared priorities.

Three practical insights stood out:

  1. One Definition of Digital Service → agreed across ministries.
  2. Quick-Win Prioritisation → focus on top 3 citizen pain points (ID renewal, business registration, healthcare booking).
  3. Shared Resource Map → pool budgets to eliminate duplication.
These changes alone allowed the agency to unlock £75,000 in immediate savings and deliver 2–3 visible improvements in the next quarter — meeting donor expectations and building citizen trust.
5. From Sprint to Action (4 Pillars Applied)

Based on the Sprint clarity, Reinvantage proposed a modest, targeted package of support:

  • Readiness → Facilitated inter-ministerial workshops to embed the “one digital service” definition.
  • Foresight → Analysed citizen feedback trends to shape the quick-win roadmap.
  • Growth → Supported the reallocation of funds to joint projects, reducing overlap.
  • Positioning → Crafted a communication plan highlighting early digital wins to donors and citizens.
6. The Results
  • 2 pilot services integrated into the central portal (ID renewal + healthcare booking).
  • Budget savings of £75,000 from eliminating overlapping projects.
  • Citizen satisfaction up modestly → call centre complaints on digital services dropped by 12%.
  • Donor confidence improved → short-term impact report received positive feedback.
The client thought it needed more funding and bigger projects.
The Sprint revealed it first needed clarity and alignment.

By applying the four pillars to a targeted scope, Reinvantage helped deliver visible results within a single quarter — proving progress to citizens and donors and laying the groundwork for deeper transformation.

You must be logged in to view this page. Login here.

Bridging the Reinvention Gap: Fill this form and get your preview copy immediately.

Future of IT: Fill this form and get your preview copy immediately.

War for Talent: Fill this form and get your copy immediately.

The Voice of Ukrainian Start-ups: Fill this form and get your copy immediately.

The uncounted engine: Ukraine’s start-up rise. Fill this form and get your copy immediately.

The Investment Promotion Playbook 2025: Fill this form and get your preview copy immediately.

The Reinvention Masterclass for Start-up Founders: Join the private cohort

Beyond Borders: Join the private edition