Flags of BRICS member countries—China, Russia, India, Brazil, South Africa—highlighting the bloc’s symbolic unity amid growing geopolitical tensions.
The BRICS delusion
Man hanging from a cliff edge, symbolizing courage, risk-taking, and the journey of personal reinvention.
Reinvention takes courage
parallax background

Lev and let die

Bulgaria will adopt the euro on January 1, 2026

July 11, 2025

5 min read

July 11, 2025

5 min read

Photo: Dreamstime.

Quite the spectacle unfolded in Sofia this week. While Europe’s parliament gave its final blessing to Bulgaria’s euro adoption on January 1, 2026, protesters in the country’s capital were busy waving Russian flags and demanding referendums. “The battle for the Bulgarian lev is the last battle for Bulgaria,” declared one enormous banner stretched across the city’s main square.

The irony would be amusing if it weren’t so misplaced. Bulgaria has been tied to the euro’s apron strings since 1997, when a devastating banking crisis forced the government to peg the lev (initially to the Deutsche Mark) at 1.95583 per euro. Walk into any Bulgarian estate agent’s office, and the prices are in euros. Check your savings account—probably euros too. Even the corner shop often displays prices in both currencies. What’s happening in January isn’t revolution; it’s paperwork.

Yet thousands have marched through Bulgarian cities, from Sofia to Varna, convinced that Brussels bureaucrats are about to steal their sovereignty. The protesters have a point about one thing: half of Bulgarians don’t want this. But they’re fighting yesterday’s war.

Croatia’s success story

Ask Boris Vujčić about euro adoption, and the Croatian central bank governor practically glows. His country joined the eurozone in January 2023, becoming the 20th member just as global inflation was spiralling out of control. Critics warned of disaster.

Instead, Croatia discovered something remarkable: lending rates converged completely with eurozone levels for the first time in the country’s history. Croatian companies suddenly found themselves competing on equal financial terms with German and French rivals. The government estimates the changeover saved the economy around 160 million euros through improved credit ratings and eliminated transaction costs.

The feared price explosion? Croatia’s euro switch added just 0.4 percentage points to annual inflation—a blip concentrated mainly in haircuts and restaurant meals. More tellingly, Croatian inflation ran lower than in Hungary, Poland, and Czechia, countries that had kept their own currencies.

One Zagreb fruit vendor captured the mood perfectly: “Maybe prices are up a few cents, but that’s nothing.” Not exactly the economic apocalypse that euro-sceptics had predicted.

The sovereignty myth

Bulgaria’s protesters worry about surrendering monetary independence, but this reveals a fundamental misunderstanding. The country joined the Exchange Rate Mechanism in July 2020, effectively handing over monetary policy to Frankfurt already. The currency board arrangement means Bulgaria’s central bank cannot cut interest rates to fight recession or raise them to combat inflation. It simply follows the European Central Bank’s lead.

Kostadin Kostadinov, leader of the pro-Russian Revival party, warns that, “someone else will decide how we spend our money, the Bulgarian budget will be approved by the European Central Bank.” This is nonsense on steroids. The ECB doesn’t approve national budgets—that’s not how the eurozone works. But facts rarely intrude on a good conspiracy theory.

Meanwhile, President Rumen Radev encouraged the protests by proposing a referendum that parliament correctly rejected as unconstitutional. His intervention smacks of electoral positioning rather than principled opposition. When your head of state is pandering to crowds carrying Russian flags, you know politics has gone off the rails.

Bulgaria’s impressive convergence

Strip away the political theatre, and Bulgaria’s economic performance looks remarkably solid. Inflation averaged 2.7 per cent over the most recent reference period, just below the ECB’s 2.8 per cent threshold. The government deficit hit exactly three per cent of GDP in 2024—cutting things fine, but meeting the fiscal criterion. Public debt remains a modest 24.1 per cent of GDP, well below the 60 per cent limit.

This convergence didn’t happen by accident. Bulgaria has travelled a long road since its banking crisis of the late 1990s, when 14 banks collapsed and inflation exceeded 300 per cent.

Those memories still haunt many Bulgarians, particularly in rural areas where people have never used foreign currency. “Some people still ask me if the Bulgarian euro will even be valid in France or Germany,” admits one government advisor, capturing the information gap perfectly.

The real test

Euro adoption probably won’t transform Bulgaria’s economy overnight. The country remains the EU’s poorest member, with a third of citizens facing poverty or social exclusion last year. Political instability (it has held eight general elections in little over four years) and corruption—not currency choice—lie at the root of these problems.

The euro is a tool, not a magic wand. Croatia’s success stems from sound economic management alongside currency union. Bulgaria’s fate will depend on whether its politicians can resist populist temptation and focus on structural reform.

Business groups understand this. Most have already begun updating their software and training staff for dual-currency operations.

The divide over euro adoption reflects deeper social fractures. In Sofia and other cities, educated professionals see currency union as a logical step in European integration. In Bulgaria’s villages, where few people travel abroad and many distrust Brussels, the euro feels like foreign imposition.

This mirrors patterns across Europe, where globalisation’s winners and losers increasingly inhabit different worlds. The protesters aren’t necessarily wrong to worry about living standards—they’re just blaming the wrong culprit.

The morning after

Come January 1, Bulgarians will wake up to find their world remarkably unchanged. ATMs will dispense euros instead of leva. The two-euro coin will bear the inscription ‘God protect Bulgaria’—a nice touch of national pride.

The real question isn’t whether Bulgaria can handle euro adoption—the mechanics are straightforward. It’s whether the country’s leaders can use monetary union as a springboard for broader reform and stronger economic growth. That depends less on currency symbols than on political will.

For now, the protesters can console themselves with this thought: if euro adoption proves disastrous, they’ll have plenty of company. Twenty other countries have already taken the plunge. Bulgaria is simply catching up with a club it should have joined years ago.

Photo: Dreamstime.

Craig Turp-Balazs

Craig Turp-Balazs

Craig Turp-Balazs is head of insight and analysis at Reinvantage.

Share

Case study: Global technology company

1. The Client

A global technology company operating across EMEA, with a regional HQ in Istanbul. The company manages 20+ markets, handling everything from brand campaigns to strategic partnerships.

Role we worked with: The EMEA Head of Marketing (supported by two regional managers).

2. The Challenge

Despite strong products and a respected global brand, the regional team was struggling with:

  • Misaligned strategy across markets → campaigns executed with inconsistent narratives.
  • Slowed growth → lead generation plateaued despite increasing spend.
  • Internal friction → marketing, sales, and product teams disagreed on KPIs and priorities.

Traditional fixes (more meetings, more reporting) only created more noise.

3. The Sprint

We ran a 10-day Remote Reinvention Sprint with the regional HQ team.

  • Day 1–3: Intake → Reviewed decks, campaign data, and plans.
  • Day 4: Sprint Session (90 mins) → Breakthroughs:
    • Sales and marketing had different definitions of “qualified lead.”
    • 40% of spend was going into low-potential markets.
    • The team assumed the problem was lack of budget, but it was actually lack of alignment.
  • Day 5–10: Synthesis → Insights distilled into a Clarity Brief + Insight Canvas.
4. The Breakthrough

The Sprint uncovered that the issue wasn’t budget, but fragmentation.
Three sharp insights unlocked a way forward:

  1. Unified KPIs bridging marketing + sales.
  2. Market prioritisation → shifting budget to 5 high-potential markets.
  3. Simplified narrative → one EMEA core story, locally adaptable.
By just realigning resources and focus, the client could unlock an estimated £250,000 in efficiency gains within the next 12 months — far exceeding the Sprint’s value guarantee. The path to higher returns was already inside the business, hidden by misalignment.
5. From Sprint to Action (4 Pillars Applied)

With clarity secured, Reinvantage didn’t suggest “more projects.”

Instead, we used the Sprint findings to create laser-focused next steps — drawing only from the areas that would deliver the most impact:

  • Readiness → Alignment workshops for sales + marketing teams. New playbooks clarified “qualified lead” definitions and reduced internal disputes.
  • Foresight → A market-opportunity scan identified which 5 countries would deliver the highest ROI, removing the guesswork from allocation.
  • Growth → Guided the reallocation of €2M budget and designed a phased rollout strategy that protected risk while maximising return.
  • Positioning → Built a messaging framework balancing global consistency with local nuance, ensuring campaigns spoke with one clear voice.

Because the Sprint had stripped away noise, these actions weren’t generic consulting ideas — they were directly tied to the breakthroughs.

6. The Results
  • +28% increase in qualified leads across the region.
  • 30% faster campaign rollout due to streamlined approvals.
  • Budget efficiency gains → €2M redirected from low-return to high-potential markets.
  • Internal cohesion → marketing + sales now use a single shared dashboard.
The client came in believing they needed more budget.
The Sprint revealed that what they really needed was clarity and alignment.

With that clarity, the four pillars became not theory, but practical tools to deliver measurable impact.

The Sprint guaranteed at least £20,000 in value — but in this case, it helped unlock more than 10x that within six months.

Case study: Regional VC fund & accelerator

1. The Client

A regional venture capital fund and accelerator focused on early-stage tech start-ups in the Baltics and Central Europe.

The fund had raised a new round and was under pressure to deliver stronger returns while also building its reputation as the go-to platform for founders.

Role we worked with: Managing Partner, supported by the Head of Portfolio Development.

2. The Challenge

Despite a promising portfolio, results were uneven.

Key issues:

  • Scattered portfolio support → no consistent playbook for start-ups, every partner did things differently.
  • Weak differentiation → founders and co-investors saw the fund as “one of many” in the region.
  • Stretched team → too many small bets, not enough clarity on which companies to double down on.

The leadership team knew something was off, but disagreed on whether the issue was pipeline quality, market conditions, or internal capacity.

3. The Sprint

We ran a 10-day Remote Reinvention Sprint with the partners and portfolio team.

  • Day 1–3: Intake → Reviewed pitch decks, pipeline funnel data, and start-up performance reports.
  • Day 4: Sprint Session (90 mins) → Breakthroughs:
    • No shared definition of a “high-potential founder.”
    • Support resources were spread too thin across the portfolio.
    • The fund’s positioning was more reactive than proactive — it didn’t own a distinctive narrative in the market.
  • Day 5–10: Synthesis → Insights consolidated into a Clarity Brief + Insight Canvas.
4. The Breakthrough

The Sprint revealed that the challenge wasn’t pipeline quality — it was lack of focus and positioning.

Three core insights provided the turning point:

  1. Portfolio Prioritisation Framework → defined clear criteria for where to double down.
  2. Founder Success Playbook → standardised support model for portfolio companies.
  3. Differentiated Narrative → repositioned the fund as “the accelerator of reinvention-ready founders.”
These shifts alone gave the fund a path to add an estimated £2M+ in portfolio value over the following 18 months, by concentrating capital and resources where they could move the needle most.
5. From Sprint to Action (4 Pillars Applied)

With clarity from the Sprint, Reinvantage created a tailored support plan:

  • Readiness → Coached partners on using the new prioritisation framework and trained the team on deploying the Founder Success Playbook.
  • Foresight → Ran scenario analysis on regional tech trends, helping the fund anticipate where capital would flow next.
  • Growth → Guided resource reallocation across the portfolio and supported new co-investor pitches for top-performing start-ups.
  • Positioning → Crafted a sharper brand story for the fund, positioning it as the reinvention partner for globally minded founders.
6. The Results
  • 10 portfolio companies onboarded to the new Playbook → greater consistency of support.
  • Raised follow-on capital for 3 top start-ups with the new prioritisation framework.
  • +26% increase in inbound deal flow from founders citing the fund’s new positioning.
  • Stronger internal cohesion → partners aligned on where to focus resources.
The client thought the problem was pipeline quality.
The Sprint showed it was actually lack of clarity and focus inside the firm.

By applying the four pillars, Reinvantage helped turn scattered effort into concentrated value creation.

The Sprint guaranteed at least £20,000 in value; here it set the stage for multi-million-pound upside in portfolio growth.

Case study: International impact Organisation

1. The Client

A large international impact organisation focused on entrepreneurship and economic empowerment.
The organisation runs multi-country programmes across Eastern Europe and Central Asia, often in partnership with global donors and corporate sponsors.

Role we worked with: Senior Programme Director, responsible for regional coordination.

2. The Challenge

The organisation had launched a flagship regional initiative supporting women entrepreneurs, but the programme was underperforming.

Key issues:

  • Fragmented delivery → each country office interpreted the programme differently.
  • Donor frustration → reporting lacked consistency and clear impact metrics.
  • Lost momentum → staff energy was spent on administration rather than scaling success stories.

Traditional programme reviews had produced long reports, but no real alignment or action.

3. The Sprint

We ran a 10-day Remote Reinvention Sprint with the regional leadership team and representatives from two country offices.

  • Day 1–3: Intake → Reviewed donor reports, programme KPIs, and field feedback.
  • Day 4: Sprint Session (90 mins) → Breakthroughs:
    • Donors cared about quantifiable outcomes, but reporting focused on stories.
    • Staff were duplicating efforts across countries, wasting time and resources.
    • The initiative lacked a clear theory of change — everyone described its purpose differently.
  • Day 5–10: Synthesis → Insights distilled into a Clarity Brief + Insight Canvas.
4. The Breakthrough

The Sprint revealed that the issue wasn’t donor pressure or programme design — it was a lack of shared framework and alignment.

Three critical insights reshaped the path forward:

  1. One Unified Theory of Change → agreed narrative for why the programme exists.
  2. Core Impact Metrics → clear, comparable KPIs across all countries.
  3. Smart Resource Sharing → digital hub to stop duplication and accelerate knowledge flow.
By eliminating duplicated reporting and clarifying what success looks like, the client saw they could save the equivalent of £100,000 in staff time annually — while also unlocking stronger donor confidence and follow-on funding opportunities.
5. From Sprint to Action (4 Pillars Applied)

Armed with Sprint clarity, Reinvantage proposed a laser-focused support plan:

  • Readiness → Trained programme leads on using the new metrics and integrated them into existing workflows.
  • Foresight → Analysed donor trends and expectations, aligning the initiative with the next funding cycle.
  • Growth → Developed a funding case based on the new unified theory of change, securing higher renewal chances.
  • Positioning → Crafted a regional success narrative and storytelling toolkit, helping them showcase results consistently across markets.
6. The Results
  • 30% less time spent on reporting → freed capacity for programme delivery.
  • Donor satisfaction improved → positive feedback on the clarity of impact evidence.
  • Secured new funding commitment → one major donor increased their contribution by 20%.
  • Stronger internal morale → staff felt they were working with clarity, not chaos.
The client thought it needed better donor management.
The Sprint revealed it needed a shared foundation across its teams.

By anchoring on the four pillars, Reinvantage turned alignment into efficiency gains and fresh funding opportunities.

The Sprint guaranteed at least £20,000 in value; here it unlocked both six-figure savings and future-proofed funding.

Case study: National digital development agency

1. The Client

A national digital development agency tasked with driving the government’s digital transformation agenda, including e-services, citizen portals, and smart city pilots.

Role we worked with: Director of Digital Transformation, supported by IT and service delivery leads from three ministries.

2. The Challenge

The agency had strong political backing but faced hurdles in implementation.

Key issues:

  • Siloed projects → each ministry developed digital tools independently, leading to duplication.
  • Citizen frustration → services were digital in name, but still required multiple logins and offline steps.
  • Funding pressure → international partners demanded clearer impact in the short term.

The agency wanted to accelerate momentum but struggled to get alignment across ministries.

3. The Sprint

We ran a 14-day Immersive Reinvention Sprint with the agency’s leadership and digital focal points from three ministries.

  • Day 1–3: Intake → Reviewed strategy docs, donor reports, and citizen feedback data.
  • Day 4: Immersive Sprint Session (half-day) → Breakthroughs:
    • Each ministry had different definitions of “digital service.”
    • 20% of budget was going into overlapping pilot projects.
    • Citizens’ top frustrations were known — but not prioritised.
  • Day 5–14: Synthesis → Insights consolidated into a Clarity Brief + Insight Canvas.
4. The Breakthrough

The Sprint revealed that the biggest blocker wasn’t lack of funding, but lack of shared priorities.

Three practical insights stood out:

  1. One Definition of Digital Service → agreed across ministries.
  2. Quick-Win Prioritisation → focus on top 3 citizen pain points (ID renewal, business registration, healthcare booking).
  3. Shared Resource Map → pool budgets to eliminate duplication.
These changes alone allowed the agency to unlock £75,000 in immediate savings and deliver 2–3 visible improvements in the next quarter — meeting donor expectations and building citizen trust.
5. From Sprint to Action (4 Pillars Applied)

Based on the Sprint clarity, Reinvantage proposed a modest, targeted package of support:

  • Readiness → Facilitated inter-ministerial workshops to embed the “one digital service” definition.
  • Foresight → Analysed citizen feedback trends to shape the quick-win roadmap.
  • Growth → Supported the reallocation of funds to joint projects, reducing overlap.
  • Positioning → Crafted a communication plan highlighting early digital wins to donors and citizens.
6. The Results
  • 2 pilot services integrated into the central portal (ID renewal + healthcare booking).
  • Budget savings of £75,000 from eliminating overlapping projects.
  • Citizen satisfaction up modestly → call centre complaints on digital services dropped by 12%.
  • Donor confidence improved → short-term impact report received positive feedback.
The client thought it needed more funding and bigger projects.
The Sprint revealed it first needed clarity and alignment.

By applying the four pillars to a targeted scope, Reinvantage helped deliver visible results within a single quarter — proving progress to citizens and donors and laying the groundwork for deeper transformation.