A lab with glowing, colorful containers holding liquid, an example of green tech
Green tech is a shift, not a sector
An illuminated open book with pages of glowing data, a visualization of open data
The open data dividend
parallax background

From Icarus to Phoenix

The Greek economy flew too close to the sun, crashed, and emerged reborn

June 9, 2025

6 min read

June 9, 2025

6 min read

Photo: Dreamstime.

In the summer of 2015 Alexis Tsipras, the firebrand prime minister of Greece, brought his country to the brink of financial collapse.  

Capital controls were imposed, banks shuttered, and Greeks could withdraw only 60 euros a day from cash machines. The Greek government missed its 1.6 billion euros payment to the IMF when its bailout expired on June 30. This made it the first developed country to effectively default to the Fund. Many predicted ‘Grexit’—Greece’s ignominious exit from the euro. 

Ten years on, and the transformation is remarkable. According the European Commission, the Greek economy is expected to expand by 2.3 per cent in 2025 and 2.2 per cent in 2026. The continues a growth streak that has outpaced the eurozone average since 2021.  

The Economist ranked Greece the world’s top economic performer for 2022 and 2023, citing significant improvements in five key economic and financial indicators. Tourism has roared back to life. Tourist arrivals exceeded 36 million in 2024, a 10 per cent increase from 2023, generating revenues of around 22 billion euros. The debt-to-GDP ratio, once a terrifying 180 per cent, is expected to reach 140.6 per cent in 2026—still high, but falling steadily. 

The darkest hour 

To understand Greece’s recovery, grasping the depths of its despair its crucial. Greek GDP fell from 242 billion euros in 2008 to 179 billion euros in 2014, a 26 per cent decline. Even today, despite the undisputed progress, GDP per capita is still 22 per cent below the pre-crisis level.  

The human cost of the crisis was devastating. Unemployment soared to 27 per cent at its peak. Wages and pensions were slashed. Hundreds of thousands of educated Greeks emigrated. 

The crisis had deep roots. Pensions and social transfers increased by a whopping seven per cent of GDP from the time of euro adoption in 2001 to the eve of the crisis. The public wage bill rose by three per cent of GDP. When the music stopped in 2009, Greece faced a primary deficit of about 10 per cent of GDP. Even without paying interest on its debts, the government was spending far more than it collected. 

Tough love 

Greece’s creditors—the European Union, European Central Bank, and International Monetary Fund, collectively known as the troika—prescribed harsh medicine.  

The country received three bailout programmes totalling nearly 300 billion euros between 2010 and 2018, still the largest financial rescue in history. In return, it had to implement sweeping reforms: pension cuts, tax rises, privatisations, and labour market liberalisation. 

The political drama reached its denouement in 2015. On July 5, a 61 per cent majority voted to reject the bailout terms in a referendum called by Tsipras. Yet just days later, the government of Tsipras reached an agreement with the European authorities for a three-year-bailout. Ironically, the bailout came with even harsher austerity conditions than those already rejected by voters.  

The U-turn was complete: the radical leftist who had promised to tear up the bailout memoranda became their enforcer. 

The reforms have largely worked. In 2024, the general government balance significantly outperformed expectations and recorded a surplus of 1.3 per cent of GDP, a far cry from the massive deficits of the crisis years. It was the fifth consecutive year that Athens outperformed a 3.5 per cent primary surplus target, as a result of higher tax revenue and lower spending. 

Tourism triumphant 

If fiscal consolidation and bitter pills provided the foundation, tourism supplied the growth engine.  

The last record high for Greece’s tourism sector was in 2019, prior to the Covid-19 pandemic, with 32 million visitors and 18 billion euros in revenues. After a pandemic-induced slump, the sector has not merely recovered but soared to new heights. The year 2024 marked a milestone for Greek tourism, with 35.9 million foreign visitors boosting tourism revenues to 21.7 billion euros

The boom reflects both pent-up post-pandemic demand and Greece’s enduring appeal. But it also brings challenges. A survey presented at the Greek Tourism (SETE) conference late last year revealed that 72.5 per cent of Greeks are concerned about overtourism.  

In response, the government has introduced visitor caps at the Acropolis and higher fees for cruise ship passengers visiting popular islands like Santorini and Mykonos. 

Greece’s recovery would have been impossible without substantial debt relief from its European partners.  

Solidarity, eventually 

The dramatic lengthening of maturities and reduction in interest rates—which gave Greece AAA interest rates averaging around 1.8 per cent and eventually the best maturity profile of any advanced country exceeding 20 years on average—produced a significant easing of the debt burden. Interest payments fell from 12 billion euros in 2009 to about six billion euros in 2018. 

Nevertheless, this solidarity came grudgingly and with strings attached. Northern European taxpayers, particularly Germans, resented bailing out what they saw as profligate Greeks. But European leaders, led by then German Chancellor Angela Merkel, ultimately concluded that the cost of Greek exit from the euro would be higher than the cost of keeping it in. 

Beyond the headlines, Greece has undergone significant structural changes. More must be done, however. Strengthened vocational education and training, as well as better recognising prior learning and developing childcare capacity, are needed to mobilise larger parts of the working-age population and ease high labour shortages and skill mismatches.  

The labour market has tightened dramatically, with the unemployment rate in February falling to to 8.6 per cent from the crisis peak of 27 per cent. 

The financial sector has also been cleaned up. A comprehensive assessment and asset quality review of major Greek banks was carried out by the ECB in the autumn of 2015. Banks that once teetered on the brink of collapse have been recapitalised and reformed. 

Model or mirage? 

Greece’s recovery demonstrates that even the most desperate fiscal situations can be turned around with sufficient political will and external support.  

Based on the budget, the Greek fiscal stance is expected to turn almost neutral in 2025, showing that austerity need not be permanent. 

Yet Greece’s experience also serves as a warning. The social cost was enormous. A lost decade of growth, mass unemployment, and emigration. The IMF forecasts that it will not be until 2034 that GDP per capita returns to pre-crisis levels. 

Moreover, Greece benefited from unique circumstances: membership of the euro (which prevented competitive devaluation but ensured continued access to hard currency), massive external support, and eventually, ultra-low interest rates.  

Other countries—particularly those not members of the eurozone, might not be so lucky. 

Nevertheless, Greece’s comeback from near-bankruptcy to growth champion is one of the more remarkable European economic stories of recent years.  

Whether it can maintain this momentum while addressing its remaining vulnerabilities will determine if this is a lasting transformation or merely a cyclical upturn.  

For now, though, the country that once symbolised European economic dysfunction has become an unlikely poster child for recovery. As Tsipras—who left office in 2019— might admit, hope has indeed come, though not quite in the form he originally imagined. 

Photo: Dreamstime.

Reinvantage Insight

Reinvantage Insight

The byline Reinvantage Insight is used to denote articles to which several members of the Reinvantage insight and analysis team may have contributed.

Share

Case study: Global technology company

1. The Client

A global technology company operating across EMEA, with a regional HQ in Istanbul. The company manages 20+ markets, handling everything from brand campaigns to strategic partnerships.

Role we worked with: The EMEA Head of Marketing (supported by two regional managers).

2. The Challenge

Despite strong products and a respected global brand, the regional team was struggling with:

  • Misaligned strategy across markets → campaigns executed with inconsistent narratives.
  • Slowed growth → lead generation plateaued despite increasing spend.
  • Internal friction → marketing, sales, and product teams disagreed on KPIs and priorities.

Traditional fixes (more meetings, more reporting) only created more noise.

3. The Sprint

We ran a 10-day Remote Reinvention Sprint with the regional HQ team.

  • Day 1–3: Intake → Reviewed decks, campaign data, and plans.
  • Day 4: Sprint Session (90 mins) → Breakthroughs:
    • Sales and marketing had different definitions of “qualified lead.”
    • 40% of spend was going into low-potential markets.
    • The team assumed the problem was lack of budget, but it was actually lack of alignment.
  • Day 5–10: Synthesis → Insights distilled into a Clarity Brief + Insight Canvas.
4. The Breakthrough

The Sprint uncovered that the issue wasn’t budget, but fragmentation.
Three sharp insights unlocked a way forward:

  1. Unified KPIs bridging marketing + sales.
  2. Market prioritisation → shifting budget to 5 high-potential markets.
  3. Simplified narrative → one EMEA core story, locally adaptable.
By just realigning resources and focus, the client could unlock an estimated £250,000 in efficiency gains within the next 12 months — far exceeding the Sprint’s value guarantee. The path to higher returns was already inside the business, hidden by misalignment.
5. From Sprint to Action (4 Pillars Applied)

With clarity secured, Reinvantage didn’t suggest “more projects.”

Instead, we used the Sprint findings to create laser-focused next steps — drawing only from the areas that would deliver the most impact:

  • Readiness → Alignment workshops for sales + marketing teams. New playbooks clarified “qualified lead” definitions and reduced internal disputes.
  • Foresight → A market-opportunity scan identified which 5 countries would deliver the highest ROI, removing the guesswork from allocation.
  • Growth → Guided the reallocation of €2M budget and designed a phased rollout strategy that protected risk while maximising return.
  • Positioning → Built a messaging framework balancing global consistency with local nuance, ensuring campaigns spoke with one clear voice.

Because the Sprint had stripped away noise, these actions weren’t generic consulting ideas — they were directly tied to the breakthroughs.

6. The Results
  • +28% increase in qualified leads across the region.
  • 30% faster campaign rollout due to streamlined approvals.
  • Budget efficiency gains → €2M redirected from low-return to high-potential markets.
  • Internal cohesion → marketing + sales now use a single shared dashboard.
The client came in believing they needed more budget.
The Sprint revealed that what they really needed was clarity and alignment.

With that clarity, the four pillars became not theory, but practical tools to deliver measurable impact.

The Sprint guaranteed at least £20,000 in value — but in this case, it helped unlock more than 10x that within six months.

Case study: Regional VC fund & accelerator

1. The Client

A regional venture capital fund and accelerator focused on early-stage tech start-ups in the Baltics and Central Europe.

The fund had raised a new round and was under pressure to deliver stronger returns while also building its reputation as the go-to platform for founders.

Role we worked with: Managing Partner, supported by the Head of Portfolio Development.

2. The Challenge

Despite a promising portfolio, results were uneven.

Key issues:

  • Scattered portfolio support → no consistent playbook for start-ups, every partner did things differently.
  • Weak differentiation → founders and co-investors saw the fund as “one of many” in the region.
  • Stretched team → too many small bets, not enough clarity on which companies to double down on.

The leadership team knew something was off, but disagreed on whether the issue was pipeline quality, market conditions, or internal capacity.

3. The Sprint

We ran a 10-day Remote Reinvention Sprint with the partners and portfolio team.

  • Day 1–3: Intake → Reviewed pitch decks, pipeline funnel data, and start-up performance reports.
  • Day 4: Sprint Session (90 mins) → Breakthroughs:
    • No shared definition of a “high-potential founder.”
    • Support resources were spread too thin across the portfolio.
    • The fund’s positioning was more reactive than proactive — it didn’t own a distinctive narrative in the market.
  • Day 5–10: Synthesis → Insights consolidated into a Clarity Brief + Insight Canvas.
4. The Breakthrough

The Sprint revealed that the challenge wasn’t pipeline quality — it was lack of focus and positioning.

Three core insights provided the turning point:

  1. Portfolio Prioritisation Framework → defined clear criteria for where to double down.
  2. Founder Success Playbook → standardised support model for portfolio companies.
  3. Differentiated Narrative → repositioned the fund as “the accelerator of reinvention-ready founders.”
These shifts alone gave the fund a path to add an estimated £2M+ in portfolio value over the following 18 months, by concentrating capital and resources where they could move the needle most.
5. From Sprint to Action (4 Pillars Applied)

With clarity from the Sprint, Reinvantage created a tailored support plan:

  • Readiness → Coached partners on using the new prioritisation framework and trained the team on deploying the Founder Success Playbook.
  • Foresight → Ran scenario analysis on regional tech trends, helping the fund anticipate where capital would flow next.
  • Growth → Guided resource reallocation across the portfolio and supported new co-investor pitches for top-performing start-ups.
  • Positioning → Crafted a sharper brand story for the fund, positioning it as the reinvention partner for globally minded founders.
6. The Results
  • 10 portfolio companies onboarded to the new Playbook → greater consistency of support.
  • Raised follow-on capital for 3 top start-ups with the new prioritisation framework.
  • +26% increase in inbound deal flow from founders citing the fund’s new positioning.
  • Stronger internal cohesion → partners aligned on where to focus resources.
The client thought the problem was pipeline quality.
The Sprint showed it was actually lack of clarity and focus inside the firm.

By applying the four pillars, Reinvantage helped turn scattered effort into concentrated value creation.

The Sprint guaranteed at least £20,000 in value; here it set the stage for multi-million-pound upside in portfolio growth.

Case study: International impact Organisation

1. The Client

A large international impact organisation focused on entrepreneurship and economic empowerment.
The organisation runs multi-country programmes across Eastern Europe and Central Asia, often in partnership with global donors and corporate sponsors.

Role we worked with: Senior Programme Director, responsible for regional coordination.

2. The Challenge

The organisation had launched a flagship regional initiative supporting women entrepreneurs, but the programme was underperforming.

Key issues:

  • Fragmented delivery → each country office interpreted the programme differently.
  • Donor frustration → reporting lacked consistency and clear impact metrics.
  • Lost momentum → staff energy was spent on administration rather than scaling success stories.

Traditional programme reviews had produced long reports, but no real alignment or action.

3. The Sprint

We ran a 10-day Remote Reinvention Sprint with the regional leadership team and representatives from two country offices.

  • Day 1–3: Intake → Reviewed donor reports, programme KPIs, and field feedback.
  • Day 4: Sprint Session (90 mins) → Breakthroughs:
    • Donors cared about quantifiable outcomes, but reporting focused on stories.
    • Staff were duplicating efforts across countries, wasting time and resources.
    • The initiative lacked a clear theory of change — everyone described its purpose differently.
  • Day 5–10: Synthesis → Insights distilled into a Clarity Brief + Insight Canvas.
4. The Breakthrough

The Sprint revealed that the issue wasn’t donor pressure or programme design — it was a lack of shared framework and alignment.

Three critical insights reshaped the path forward:

  1. One Unified Theory of Change → agreed narrative for why the programme exists.
  2. Core Impact Metrics → clear, comparable KPIs across all countries.
  3. Smart Resource Sharing → digital hub to stop duplication and accelerate knowledge flow.
By eliminating duplicated reporting and clarifying what success looks like, the client saw they could save the equivalent of £100,000 in staff time annually — while also unlocking stronger donor confidence and follow-on funding opportunities.
5. From Sprint to Action (4 Pillars Applied)

Armed with Sprint clarity, Reinvantage proposed a laser-focused support plan:

  • Readiness → Trained programme leads on using the new metrics and integrated them into existing workflows.
  • Foresight → Analysed donor trends and expectations, aligning the initiative with the next funding cycle.
  • Growth → Developed a funding case based on the new unified theory of change, securing higher renewal chances.
  • Positioning → Crafted a regional success narrative and storytelling toolkit, helping them showcase results consistently across markets.
6. The Results
  • 30% less time spent on reporting → freed capacity for programme delivery.
  • Donor satisfaction improved → positive feedback on the clarity of impact evidence.
  • Secured new funding commitment → one major donor increased their contribution by 20%.
  • Stronger internal morale → staff felt they were working with clarity, not chaos.
The client thought it needed better donor management.
The Sprint revealed it needed a shared foundation across its teams.

By anchoring on the four pillars, Reinvantage turned alignment into efficiency gains and fresh funding opportunities.

The Sprint guaranteed at least £20,000 in value; here it unlocked both six-figure savings and future-proofed funding.

Case study: National digital development agency

1. The Client

A national digital development agency tasked with driving the government’s digital transformation agenda, including e-services, citizen portals, and smart city pilots.

Role we worked with: Director of Digital Transformation, supported by IT and service delivery leads from three ministries.

2. The Challenge

The agency had strong political backing but faced hurdles in implementation.

Key issues:

  • Siloed projects → each ministry developed digital tools independently, leading to duplication.
  • Citizen frustration → services were digital in name, but still required multiple logins and offline steps.
  • Funding pressure → international partners demanded clearer impact in the short term.

The agency wanted to accelerate momentum but struggled to get alignment across ministries.

3. The Sprint

We ran a 14-day Immersive Reinvention Sprint with the agency’s leadership and digital focal points from three ministries.

  • Day 1–3: Intake → Reviewed strategy docs, donor reports, and citizen feedback data.
  • Day 4: Immersive Sprint Session (half-day) → Breakthroughs:
    • Each ministry had different definitions of “digital service.”
    • 20% of budget was going into overlapping pilot projects.
    • Citizens’ top frustrations were known — but not prioritised.
  • Day 5–14: Synthesis → Insights consolidated into a Clarity Brief + Insight Canvas.
4. The Breakthrough

The Sprint revealed that the biggest blocker wasn’t lack of funding, but lack of shared priorities.

Three practical insights stood out:

  1. One Definition of Digital Service → agreed across ministries.
  2. Quick-Win Prioritisation → focus on top 3 citizen pain points (ID renewal, business registration, healthcare booking).
  3. Shared Resource Map → pool budgets to eliminate duplication.
These changes alone allowed the agency to unlock £75,000 in immediate savings and deliver 2–3 visible improvements in the next quarter — meeting donor expectations and building citizen trust.
5. From Sprint to Action (4 Pillars Applied)

Based on the Sprint clarity, Reinvantage proposed a modest, targeted package of support:

  • Readiness → Facilitated inter-ministerial workshops to embed the “one digital service” definition.
  • Foresight → Analysed citizen feedback trends to shape the quick-win roadmap.
  • Growth → Supported the reallocation of funds to joint projects, reducing overlap.
  • Positioning → Crafted a communication plan highlighting early digital wins to donors and citizens.
6. The Results
  • 2 pilot services integrated into the central portal (ID renewal + healthcare booking).
  • Budget savings of £75,000 from eliminating overlapping projects.
  • Citizen satisfaction up modestly → call centre complaints on digital services dropped by 12%.
  • Donor confidence improved → short-term impact report received positive feedback.
The client thought it needed more funding and bigger projects.
The Sprint revealed it first needed clarity and alignment.

By applying the four pillars to a targeted scope, Reinvantage helped deliver visible results within a single quarter — proving progress to citizens and donors and laying the groundwork for deeper transformation.

You must be logged in to view this page. Login here.