Employees working at open-plan office desks, symbolizing corporate mandates forcing staff back instead of remote work freedom.
Present and incorrect
europe
From crisis management to transformation
parallax background

Generation Analogue

Digital natives are choosing decidedly undigital lives

September 11, 2025

10 min read

September 11, 2025

10 min read

Photo: Dreamstime.

The received wisdom about Generation Alpha—those born between 2010 and 2025—has been refreshingly predictable. Here, supposedly, was the ultimate digital generation: children who would swipe before they could walk, code before they could read, and live their entire lives through glowing rectangles.

Technology consultants and marketing gurus have spent years breathlessly describing a cohort so immersed in the digital realm that they would make their Gen Z predecessors look like Luddites.

How inconvenient, then, that Generation Alpha appears to be doing the opposite.

The great digital retreat

Far from embracing an ever-more connected existence, the youngest generation is staging what might charitably be called a quiet rebellion against their supposed digital destiny. The numbers, when examined closely, tell a rather different story than the one Silicon Valley would prefer.

Since 2021, there has been a 10 per cent drop in parents saying their child spends significant time on devices, and a seven per cent decline in online activity. More tellingly, Generation Alpha children are showing declining interest in watching television, particularly films and movies, and talking to friends online, whilst demonstrating increased enthusiasm for seeing friends in person and playing sports.

This shift extends beyond mere preference. When it comes to favourite school subjects, 12-15 year olds have replaced IT and computing with gym class and sports. Computing has tumbled from fifth to eighth place in their list of interests, displaced by decidedly analog pursuits such as holidays, vacations, and caring for animals.

The irony is delicious. Just as parents and educators were fretting about raising a generation of screen-addicted digital zombies, the children themselves began reaching for physical books, demanding cinema experiences, and rediscovering the radical notion that human interaction might be more satisfying than algorithmic engagement.

The paper paradox

Perhaps nowhere is this analog renaissance more surprising than in reading habits. Despite predictions that physical books would go the way of the gramophone, 72 per cent of Generation Alpha prefer reading physical books over digital formats—and this is a generation that spends 2.5 hours daily on digital devices.

Not the figures are without contradictions. Generation Alpha children read an average of 12 books per year and own an average of 50 physical books. However, 85 per cent of Generation Alpha parents report their children have difficulty focusing on traditional long-form book reading, especially when they’re physical books, not e-books—yet the children persist in choosing paper over pixels.

This preference for physical media extends beyond books. Two forms of entertainment stand out as becoming more important to children since the pandemic—cinema and podcasts, both experiences that notably avoid staring at mobile phone screens. Nearly a third of 8-11 year olds now visit cinemas monthly, whilst teens demonstrate impatience with streaming delays, preferring the communal experience of seeing films as soon as they are released.

The attention economy’s diminishing returns

The conventional narrative suggested that Generation Alpha would possess goldfish-like attention spans, constantly flitting between notifications and updates. Yet the data reveals a more nuanced picture. The average attention span of Generation Alpha is around eight seconds when engaging with digital content, identical to Generation Z—hardly the precipitous decline that pessimists predicted.

More intriguingly, task completion rates improve by 45 per cent when activities are broken into five-minute segments, suggesting that Generation Alpha has simply developed different optimisation strategies rather than inherently shorter attention spans. They appear to be applying lean startup methodology to childhood: failing fast, iterating quickly, and abandoning inefficient activities with admirable ruthlessness.

This pragmatic approach to attention management may explain their growing skepticism towards digital engagement. Why spend hours scrolling through algorithmically curated content when the same dopamine hit can be achieved more efficiently through physical activity or face-to-face interaction?

The wellness factor

The shift towards analogue activities coincides with growing health consciousness among Generation Alpha and their millennial parents. Only 27 per cent of Generation Alpha children meet the WHO’s recommended 60 minutes of daily physical activity, a statistic that has prompted both concern and action.

There has been a 10 per cent rise in Generation Alpha children worried about getting ill since 2021, suggesting a generation acutely aware of the physical costs of sedentary, screen-based lifestyles. The response has been predictably practical: if digital devices contribute to health problems, the obvious solution is to spend less time with them.

This health-driven motivation differs markedly from previous generational reactions against technology, which tended to be philosophical or aesthetic in nature. Generation Alpha’s approach is refreshingly utilitarian: they are not rejecting technology on principle, but rather optimising their time allocation based on measurable outcomes.

The influence economy’s limits

The data also reveals cracks in the much-vaunted creator economy’s hold over young minds. While 49 per cent of children say they trust influencers as much as family and friends when it comes to product recommendations, there are signs that this trust is becoming more selective and strategic.

Since 2021, there has been a 16 per cent decrease in 12-15 year olds saying they watch the news, and an eight per cent drop in teenagers expressing interest in environmental issues. This suggests not disengagement, but rather a calculated retreat from information overload—what researchers term ‘news fatigue’ and ‘climate fatigue’.

Generation Alpha appears to be developing sophisticated filtering mechanisms, consuming influencer content strategically rather than passively. They engage with creators who add tangible value to their lives whilst ruthlessly discarding those who merely occupy attention without providing utility.

The millennial parent effect

This analogue shift cannot be understood without considering the influence of Generation Alpha’s predominantly millennial parents. Having lived through the early internet’s Wild West period, experienced social media’s evolution from novelty to necessity, and witnessed the mental health costs of constant connectivity, millennial parents bring hard-earned wisdom to child-rearing.

Generation Alpha has experienced an upbringing different to that of past generations, with parents having internet resources readily available and adopting less traditional, more collaborative parenting styles. These parents are actively modeling balanced technology use, implementing screen-time limits, and prioritising offline family activities.

The result is a generation that views technology as a tool rather than an identity. Generation Alpha children use devices competently when necessary, but feel no compulsion to demonstrate their digital nativity through constant engagement. They are, paradoxically, more digitally mature than their predecessors precisely because they are less digitally dependent.

Strategic implications for business

The analogue shift presents both existential challenges and unexpected opportunities for companies across sectors. Businesses that assumed Generation Alpha would represent the apotheosis of digital engagement must now contend with consumers who view technology as a means rather than an end.

Technology companies face the most immediate disruption. Social media platforms banking on ever-increasing engagement metrics may find their growth trajectories flattening as Generation Alpha adopts more intentional usage patterns. Gaming companies, meanwhile, must compete not just with other digital entertainment but with revitalised interest in physical sports and outdoor activities.

The response requires fundamental rethinking of value propositions. Successful platforms will likely shift from attention harvesting to utility provision—offering tools that enhance rather than replace offline experiences. Companies like Duolingo, which gamifies learning rather than gaming itself, may prove more resilient than pure entertainment apps.

Retail and consumer goods companies must navigate increasingly hybrid preferences. Generation Alpha’s simultaneous embrace of e-commerce convenience and physical book ownership suggests demand for what retailers term ‘phygital’ experiences—seamless integration of digital efficiency with tangible satisfaction.

Successful retailers are already adapting. Nike’s strategy of combining app-based customisation with flagship store experiences, or Lego’s integration of digital building instructions with physical construction, demonstrates how brands can serve both digital natives and analog preferences simultaneously.

Educational technology providers face perhaps the greatest strategic challenge. The assumption that digital-first learning would appeal to digital natives has proven questionable. Instead, Generation Alpha appears to thrive in blended environments that combine technological efficiency with human interaction and physical manipulation.

Companies like Khan Academy have found success by positioning technology as a supplement to, rather than replacement for, traditional teaching methods. The lesson for EdTech: Generation Alpha wants better education, not necessarily more digital education.

Entertainment and media businesses must recalibrate distribution strategies. Generation Alpha’s preference for cinema experiences over streaming, and physical books over e-readers, suggests that predictions of purely digital consumption were premature.

Publishers reporting increased demand for physical books should invest in production capabilities that seemed obsolete just years ago. Cinema chains benefit from Generation Alpha’s impatience with release windows and preference for communal viewing experiences. Streaming services may need to reconsider simultaneous release strategies that cannibalise theatrical experiences.

Health and wellness sectors emerge as unexpected beneficiaries. Generation Alpha’s acute awareness of screen time’s physical costs creates opportunities for companies offering analogue alternatives. Sports equipment manufacturers, outdoor activity providers, and even board game companies are witnessing renewed demand.

When digital natives go analogue

What to make of this strange turn of events? The children who were supposed to herald the age of total digital immersion are teaching their parents the value of switching off. Their approach boils down to this: use YouTube to learn guitar chords, then put the phone away and actually strum the strings.

Consider what this means for institutions built on dodgy assumptions. Universities that spent millions on ‘digital learning environments’ may discover their students prefer scuffed lecture halls with blackboards. Employers designing offices around Slack channels might find Generation Alpha workers clamouring for whiteboards and actual water coolers where people gather to chat.

The consulting industry has naturally coined a term for this: ‘digital wellness’. But Generation Alpha seems less interested in wellness than in results. They have worked out that reading a physical book causes less eye strain than squinting at screens, that face-to-face conversation requires fewer follow-up texts, and that kicking a football burns more calories than watching football videos.

Their elders may find this revelation shocking, but Generation Alpha has reached a rather obvious conclusion: being good with technology does not mean being glued to it. The most sophisticated users, it turns out, know when to power down.

The much-vaunted ‘phygital’ future is evolving differently than Silicon Valley imagined. Rather than everything melding into seamless connectivity, Generation Alpha keeps digital tools in their place: handy for homework, useless for happiness.

Being born clutching smartphones, apparently, does not make one a smartphone devotee. Generation Alpha’s analog rebellion contains a lesson their screen-obsessed elders are slowly learning: in an attention economy, the most subversive act is simply looking away.

What emerges from this data is a generation that treats technology rather like a well-stocked toolbox: immensely useful when you need a hammer, but hardly worth admiring when the job requires a paintbrush. The consultants who spent years breathlessly explaining how Generation Alpha would live entirely through screens may have confused familiarity with preference.

This presents an awkward problem for companies that bet heavily on the myth of the permanently plugged-in child. Building a business model around capturing the attention of customers who have already moved on is rather like opening an ice cream parlour just as everyone discovers they are lactose intolerant. The market, as it turns out, has other plans.

Photo: Dreamstime.

Share

Case study: Global technology company

1. The Client

A global technology company operating across EMEA, with a regional HQ in Istanbul. The company manages 20+ markets, handling everything from brand campaigns to strategic partnerships.

Role we worked with: The EMEA Head of Marketing (supported by two regional managers).

2. The Challenge

Despite strong products and a respected global brand, the regional team was struggling with:

  • Misaligned strategy across markets → campaigns executed with inconsistent narratives.
  • Slowed growth → lead generation plateaued despite increasing spend.
  • Internal friction → marketing, sales, and product teams disagreed on KPIs and priorities.

Traditional fixes (more meetings, more reporting) only created more noise.

3. The Sprint

We ran a 10-day Remote Reinvention Sprint with the regional HQ team.

  • Day 1–3: Intake → Reviewed decks, campaign data, and plans.
  • Day 4: Sprint Session (90 mins) → Breakthroughs:
    • Sales and marketing had different definitions of “qualified lead.”
    • 40% of spend was going into low-potential markets.
    • The team assumed the problem was lack of budget, but it was actually lack of alignment.
  • Day 5–10: Synthesis → Insights distilled into a Clarity Brief + Insight Canvas.
4. The Breakthrough

The Sprint uncovered that the issue wasn’t budget, but fragmentation.
Three sharp insights unlocked a way forward:

  1. Unified KPIs bridging marketing + sales.
  2. Market prioritisation → shifting budget to 5 high-potential markets.
  3. Simplified narrative → one EMEA core story, locally adaptable.
By just realigning resources and focus, the client could unlock an estimated £250,000 in efficiency gains within the next 12 months — far exceeding the Sprint’s value guarantee. The path to higher returns was already inside the business, hidden by misalignment.
5. From Sprint to Action (4 Pillars Applied)

With clarity secured, Reinvantage didn’t suggest “more projects.”

Instead, we used the Sprint findings to create laser-focused next steps — drawing only from the areas that would deliver the most impact:

  • Readiness → Alignment workshops for sales + marketing teams. New playbooks clarified “qualified lead” definitions and reduced internal disputes.
  • Foresight → A market-opportunity scan identified which 5 countries would deliver the highest ROI, removing the guesswork from allocation.
  • Growth → Guided the reallocation of €2M budget and designed a phased rollout strategy that protected risk while maximising return.
  • Positioning → Built a messaging framework balancing global consistency with local nuance, ensuring campaigns spoke with one clear voice.

Because the Sprint had stripped away noise, these actions weren’t generic consulting ideas — they were directly tied to the breakthroughs.

6. The Results
  • +28% increase in qualified leads across the region.
  • 30% faster campaign rollout due to streamlined approvals.
  • Budget efficiency gains → €2M redirected from low-return to high-potential markets.
  • Internal cohesion → marketing + sales now use a single shared dashboard.
The client came in believing they needed more budget.
The Sprint revealed that what they really needed was clarity and alignment.

With that clarity, the four pillars became not theory, but practical tools to deliver measurable impact.

The Sprint guaranteed at least £20,000 in value — but in this case, it helped unlock more than 10x that within six months.

Case study: Regional VC fund & accelerator

1. The Client

A regional venture capital fund and accelerator focused on early-stage tech start-ups in the Baltics and Central Europe.

The fund had raised a new round and was under pressure to deliver stronger returns while also building its reputation as the go-to platform for founders.

Role we worked with: Managing Partner, supported by the Head of Portfolio Development.

2. The Challenge

Despite a promising portfolio, results were uneven.

Key issues:

  • Scattered portfolio support → no consistent playbook for start-ups, every partner did things differently.
  • Weak differentiation → founders and co-investors saw the fund as “one of many” in the region.
  • Stretched team → too many small bets, not enough clarity on which companies to double down on.

The leadership team knew something was off, but disagreed on whether the issue was pipeline quality, market conditions, or internal capacity.

3. The Sprint

We ran a 10-day Remote Reinvention Sprint with the partners and portfolio team.

  • Day 1–3: Intake → Reviewed pitch decks, pipeline funnel data, and start-up performance reports.
  • Day 4: Sprint Session (90 mins) → Breakthroughs:
    • No shared definition of a “high-potential founder.”
    • Support resources were spread too thin across the portfolio.
    • The fund’s positioning was more reactive than proactive — it didn’t own a distinctive narrative in the market.
  • Day 5–10: Synthesis → Insights consolidated into a Clarity Brief + Insight Canvas.
4. The Breakthrough

The Sprint revealed that the challenge wasn’t pipeline quality — it was lack of focus and positioning.

Three core insights provided the turning point:

  1. Portfolio Prioritisation Framework → defined clear criteria for where to double down.
  2. Founder Success Playbook → standardised support model for portfolio companies.
  3. Differentiated Narrative → repositioned the fund as “the accelerator of reinvention-ready founders.”
These shifts alone gave the fund a path to add an estimated £2M+ in portfolio value over the following 18 months, by concentrating capital and resources where they could move the needle most.
5. From Sprint to Action (4 Pillars Applied)

With clarity from the Sprint, Reinvantage created a tailored support plan:

  • Readiness → Coached partners on using the new prioritisation framework and trained the team on deploying the Founder Success Playbook.
  • Foresight → Ran scenario analysis on regional tech trends, helping the fund anticipate where capital would flow next.
  • Growth → Guided resource reallocation across the portfolio and supported new co-investor pitches for top-performing start-ups.
  • Positioning → Crafted a sharper brand story for the fund, positioning it as the reinvention partner for globally minded founders.
6. The Results
  • 10 portfolio companies onboarded to the new Playbook → greater consistency of support.
  • Raised follow-on capital for 3 top start-ups with the new prioritisation framework.
  • +26% increase in inbound deal flow from founders citing the fund’s new positioning.
  • Stronger internal cohesion → partners aligned on where to focus resources.
The client thought the problem was pipeline quality.
The Sprint showed it was actually lack of clarity and focus inside the firm.

By applying the four pillars, Reinvantage helped turn scattered effort into concentrated value creation.

The Sprint guaranteed at least £20,000 in value; here it set the stage for multi-million-pound upside in portfolio growth.

Case study: International impact Organisation

1. The Client

A large international impact organisation focused on entrepreneurship and economic empowerment.
The organisation runs multi-country programmes across Eastern Europe and Central Asia, often in partnership with global donors and corporate sponsors.

Role we worked with: Senior Programme Director, responsible for regional coordination.

2. The Challenge

The organisation had launched a flagship regional initiative supporting women entrepreneurs, but the programme was underperforming.

Key issues:

  • Fragmented delivery → each country office interpreted the programme differently.
  • Donor frustration → reporting lacked consistency and clear impact metrics.
  • Lost momentum → staff energy was spent on administration rather than scaling success stories.

Traditional programme reviews had produced long reports, but no real alignment or action.

3. The Sprint

We ran a 10-day Remote Reinvention Sprint with the regional leadership team and representatives from two country offices.

  • Day 1–3: Intake → Reviewed donor reports, programme KPIs, and field feedback.
  • Day 4: Sprint Session (90 mins) → Breakthroughs:
    • Donors cared about quantifiable outcomes, but reporting focused on stories.
    • Staff were duplicating efforts across countries, wasting time and resources.
    • The initiative lacked a clear theory of change — everyone described its purpose differently.
  • Day 5–10: Synthesis → Insights distilled into a Clarity Brief + Insight Canvas.
4. The Breakthrough

The Sprint revealed that the issue wasn’t donor pressure or programme design — it was a lack of shared framework and alignment.

Three critical insights reshaped the path forward:

  1. One Unified Theory of Change → agreed narrative for why the programme exists.
  2. Core Impact Metrics → clear, comparable KPIs across all countries.
  3. Smart Resource Sharing → digital hub to stop duplication and accelerate knowledge flow.
By eliminating duplicated reporting and clarifying what success looks like, the client saw they could save the equivalent of £100,000 in staff time annually — while also unlocking stronger donor confidence and follow-on funding opportunities.
5. From Sprint to Action (4 Pillars Applied)

Armed with Sprint clarity, Reinvantage proposed a laser-focused support plan:

  • Readiness → Trained programme leads on using the new metrics and integrated them into existing workflows.
  • Foresight → Analysed donor trends and expectations, aligning the initiative with the next funding cycle.
  • Growth → Developed a funding case based on the new unified theory of change, securing higher renewal chances.
  • Positioning → Crafted a regional success narrative and storytelling toolkit, helping them showcase results consistently across markets.
6. The Results
  • 30% less time spent on reporting → freed capacity for programme delivery.
  • Donor satisfaction improved → positive feedback on the clarity of impact evidence.
  • Secured new funding commitment → one major donor increased their contribution by 20%.
  • Stronger internal morale → staff felt they were working with clarity, not chaos.
The client thought it needed better donor management.
The Sprint revealed it needed a shared foundation across its teams.

By anchoring on the four pillars, Reinvantage turned alignment into efficiency gains and fresh funding opportunities.

The Sprint guaranteed at least £20,000 in value; here it unlocked both six-figure savings and future-proofed funding.

Case study: National digital development agency

1. The Client

A national digital development agency tasked with driving the government’s digital transformation agenda, including e-services, citizen portals, and smart city pilots.

Role we worked with: Director of Digital Transformation, supported by IT and service delivery leads from three ministries.

2. The Challenge

The agency had strong political backing but faced hurdles in implementation.

Key issues:

  • Siloed projects → each ministry developed digital tools independently, leading to duplication.
  • Citizen frustration → services were digital in name, but still required multiple logins and offline steps.
  • Funding pressure → international partners demanded clearer impact in the short term.

The agency wanted to accelerate momentum but struggled to get alignment across ministries.

3. The Sprint

We ran a 14-day Immersive Reinvention Sprint with the agency’s leadership and digital focal points from three ministries.

  • Day 1–3: Intake → Reviewed strategy docs, donor reports, and citizen feedback data.
  • Day 4: Immersive Sprint Session (half-day) → Breakthroughs:
    • Each ministry had different definitions of “digital service.”
    • 20% of budget was going into overlapping pilot projects.
    • Citizens’ top frustrations were known — but not prioritised.
  • Day 5–14: Synthesis → Insights consolidated into a Clarity Brief + Insight Canvas.
4. The Breakthrough

The Sprint revealed that the biggest blocker wasn’t lack of funding, but lack of shared priorities.

Three practical insights stood out:

  1. One Definition of Digital Service → agreed across ministries.
  2. Quick-Win Prioritisation → focus on top 3 citizen pain points (ID renewal, business registration, healthcare booking).
  3. Shared Resource Map → pool budgets to eliminate duplication.
These changes alone allowed the agency to unlock £75,000 in immediate savings and deliver 2–3 visible improvements in the next quarter — meeting donor expectations and building citizen trust.
5. From Sprint to Action (4 Pillars Applied)

Based on the Sprint clarity, Reinvantage proposed a modest, targeted package of support:

  • Readiness → Facilitated inter-ministerial workshops to embed the “one digital service” definition.
  • Foresight → Analysed citizen feedback trends to shape the quick-win roadmap.
  • Growth → Supported the reallocation of funds to joint projects, reducing overlap.
  • Positioning → Crafted a communication plan highlighting early digital wins to donors and citizens.
6. The Results
  • 2 pilot services integrated into the central portal (ID renewal + healthcare booking).
  • Budget savings of £75,000 from eliminating overlapping projects.
  • Citizen satisfaction up modestly → call centre complaints on digital services dropped by 12%.
  • Donor confidence improved → short-term impact report received positive feedback.
The client thought it needed more funding and bigger projects.
The Sprint revealed it first needed clarity and alignment.

By applying the four pillars to a targeted scope, Reinvantage helped deliver visible results within a single quarter — proving progress to citizens and donors and laying the groundwork for deeper transformation.