holding back
In search of validation
Assortment of baby food pouches and juices on a supermarket shelf in Poland, highlighting everyday consumer goods often excluded from VAT taxation debates in Europe.
Rethinking taxation
parallax background

The talented civil servant

Citizens want great public services but are wary of high salaries and revolving doors

August 26, 2025

6 min read

August 26, 2025

6 min read

Photo: Dreamstime.

Picture this: you’re a qualified nurse in Manchester. Tesco is offering better pay than the NHS. So you hang up your stethoscope and start scanning barcodes instead.

Absurd? It’s happening. And it’s just one symptom of a much bigger problem plaguing European governments from Lisbon to Tallinn.

Citizens want world-class public services. They also want low taxes and modest public sector salaries. These demands don’t add up—and the maths is finally catching up with reality.

The great exodus

Walk through any European hospital, school, or government office and you’ll hear the same story. Good people are leaving. Fast.

In Britain, 15,000 to 23,000 doctors quit the NHS between September 2022 and 2023 alone. That’s roughly half the country’s new medical graduates walking out the door each year. The replacement bill? Up to 2.4 billion UK pounds annually. You could fund several small countries’ entire health budgets with that money.

It’s not just doctors. Teachers are fleeing too. France has more than 3,000 vacant teaching posts. The reason isn’t rocket science: French teachers earn roughly half what their German counterparts make.

Meanwhile, 92 per cent of public services employers report skills shortages. When government job postings get filled at barely 40 per cent—the worst rate among major economic sectors—you know something’s broken.

The trust deficit

But money isn’t the only problem. Europeans have grown deeply suspicious of the ‘revolving door’ between public and private sectors. When former EU Commissioner Neelie Kroes lobbied for Uber shortly after leaving office, it confirmed voters’ worst fears about cosy relationships between Brussels and big business.

EU Ombudsman Emily O’Reilly warns that revolving doors have a ‘corrosive effect’ on public trust, fuelling euroscepticism. Fair enough—except this suspicion now extends to any career movement between sectors, even when it might actually improve government.

The result? A vicious cycle where talented people avoid public service, making government less competent, which breeds more distrust, driving away even more talent.

Estonia breaks the mould

Then there’s Estonia. This Baltic nation of 1.3 million people has arguably cracked the code. Top talent flows freely between government and start-ups without anyone batting an eyelid. A software developer might spend three years building digital infrastructure for the state, then launch a fintech start-up, then return to government to work on blockchain voting systems.

The results speak for themselves. Estonia offers all of its public services online. Nearly everyone has digital ID. A third of votes are cast electronically. The government reckons its digital infrastructure saves two per cent of GDP annually—that’s real money, not consultant-speak.

How’d they pull it off? Three ingredients: a determination to modernise, small size enabling rapid change, and—crucially—treating public service as prestigious but temporary. As Estonia’s former president Toomas Hendrik Ilves put it: “You cannot bribe a computer”. Digital systems cut corruption opportunities dramatically.

Tallinn hosts thousands of start-ups. The New York Times has dubbed it Silicon Valley on the Baltic Sea. Not bad for a country that regained independence just over thirty years ago.

The non-monetary toolkit

Can’t match private sector salaries? There are workarounds.

Research shows 86 per cent of employees would leave their jobs for better development opportunities. Meanwhile, 94 per cent want more flexibility. Smart governments are taking note.

Professional development works because it’s genuinely win-win: employees grow their skills whilst employers get higher retention and job satisfaction. Some agencies now offer sabbaticals, mentorship programmes, or chances to work on projects impossible in the private sector. Where else can you redesign a country’s entire healthcare system or build digital democracy platforms?

The Nordic countries excel here. Despite their differences, Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden share comprehensive workforce development and exceptionally low corruption. All four rank in the top 10 least corrupt countries globally in Transparency International’s annual survey.

High trust creates a virtuous circle: talented people join government because they believe it works, and their competence proves them right.

Embracing the revolving door

Maybe the solution isn’t stopping talent movement between sectors—it’s managing it better.

Cross-sector movement often brings benefits. Former private sector employees understand markets and technology in ways career civil servants don’t. Ex-government officials bring regulatory knowledge and public interest perspectives to companies.

Transparency experts suggest 12-18 month cooling-off periods to prevent obvious conflicts. Beyond that, governments should embrace ‘tour of duty’ models borrowed from military service. Talented people commit to specific projects for defined periods, then move on.

This appeals to ambitious professionals who’d never consider traditional lifelong civil service careers. It also brings fresh thinking to institutions that desperately need it.

Estonia gets this. Its government has remained “open to innovative solutions and cooperation with the private sector”. Result: Europe’s most digitally advanced society.

The digital multiplier

Here’s a radical thought: instead of hiring thousands more civil servants, why not make existing ones vastly more productive?

Estonia automated routine processes and created genuinely user-friendly online services. Citizens handle almost any bureaucratic task online, from filing taxes to registering companies in minutes, not days.

This approach transforms rather than eliminates the need for talent. You need fewer form-processors but more digital architects, user experience designers, and systems integrators. These roles often appeal to tech professionals who’d never consider traditional government jobs.

Reality check

The costs of getting this wrong are mounting fast. When half of France’s petrol stations ran dry in 2023 during public sector strikes over pension reforms, the economic damage was immediate and visible. When NHS waiting lists balloon because doctors emigrate to Australia for better pay and conditions, people die.

European governments face a choice. They can continue penny-pinching their way to institutional decay, or they can recognise that quality public services require quality people—and quality people have options.

Estonia’s small size and unique history provided advantages others lack. But its core insight applies everywhere: public and private sectors work best as partners, not rivals. Countries that embrace radical transparency and collaboration will build the civil services they need.

The rest will make do with what they can afford—and discover that in public services, as in most things, you get what you pay for.

Photo: Dreamstime.

Craig Turp-Balazs

Craig Turp-Balazs

Craig Turp-Balazs is head of insight and analysis at Reinvantage.

Share

Case study: Global technology company

1. The Client

A global technology company operating across EMEA, with a regional HQ in Istanbul. The company manages 20+ markets, handling everything from brand campaigns to strategic partnerships.

Role we worked with: The EMEA Head of Marketing (supported by two regional managers).

2. The Challenge

Despite strong products and a respected global brand, the regional team was struggling with:

  • Misaligned strategy across markets → campaigns executed with inconsistent narratives.
  • Slowed growth → lead generation plateaued despite increasing spend.
  • Internal friction → marketing, sales, and product teams disagreed on KPIs and priorities.

Traditional fixes (more meetings, more reporting) only created more noise.

3. The Sprint

We ran a 10-day Remote Reinvention Sprint with the regional HQ team.

  • Day 1–3: Intake → Reviewed decks, campaign data, and plans.
  • Day 4: Sprint Session (90 mins) → Breakthroughs:
    • Sales and marketing had different definitions of “qualified lead.”
    • 40% of spend was going into low-potential markets.
    • The team assumed the problem was lack of budget, but it was actually lack of alignment.
  • Day 5–10: Synthesis → Insights distilled into a Clarity Brief + Insight Canvas.
4. The Breakthrough

The Sprint uncovered that the issue wasn’t budget, but fragmentation.
Three sharp insights unlocked a way forward:

  1. Unified KPIs bridging marketing + sales.
  2. Market prioritisation → shifting budget to 5 high-potential markets.
  3. Simplified narrative → one EMEA core story, locally adaptable.
By just realigning resources and focus, the client could unlock an estimated £250,000 in efficiency gains within the next 12 months — far exceeding the Sprint’s value guarantee. The path to higher returns was already inside the business, hidden by misalignment.
5. From Sprint to Action (4 Pillars Applied)

With clarity secured, Reinvantage didn’t suggest “more projects.”

Instead, we used the Sprint findings to create laser-focused next steps — drawing only from the areas that would deliver the most impact:

  • Readiness → Alignment workshops for sales + marketing teams. New playbooks clarified “qualified lead” definitions and reduced internal disputes.
  • Foresight → A market-opportunity scan identified which 5 countries would deliver the highest ROI, removing the guesswork from allocation.
  • Growth → Guided the reallocation of €2M budget and designed a phased rollout strategy that protected risk while maximising return.
  • Positioning → Built a messaging framework balancing global consistency with local nuance, ensuring campaigns spoke with one clear voice.

Because the Sprint had stripped away noise, these actions weren’t generic consulting ideas — they were directly tied to the breakthroughs.

6. The Results
  • +28% increase in qualified leads across the region.
  • 30% faster campaign rollout due to streamlined approvals.
  • Budget efficiency gains → €2M redirected from low-return to high-potential markets.
  • Internal cohesion → marketing + sales now use a single shared dashboard.
The client came in believing they needed more budget.
The Sprint revealed that what they really needed was clarity and alignment.

With that clarity, the four pillars became not theory, but practical tools to deliver measurable impact.

The Sprint guaranteed at least £20,000 in value — but in this case, it helped unlock more than 10x that within six months.

Case study: Regional VC fund & accelerator

1. The Client

A regional venture capital fund and accelerator focused on early-stage tech start-ups in the Baltics and Central Europe.

The fund had raised a new round and was under pressure to deliver stronger returns while also building its reputation as the go-to platform for founders.

Role we worked with: Managing Partner, supported by the Head of Portfolio Development.

2. The Challenge

Despite a promising portfolio, results were uneven.

Key issues:

  • Scattered portfolio support → no consistent playbook for start-ups, every partner did things differently.
  • Weak differentiation → founders and co-investors saw the fund as “one of many” in the region.
  • Stretched team → too many small bets, not enough clarity on which companies to double down on.

The leadership team knew something was off, but disagreed on whether the issue was pipeline quality, market conditions, or internal capacity.

3. The Sprint

We ran a 10-day Remote Reinvention Sprint with the partners and portfolio team.

  • Day 1–3: Intake → Reviewed pitch decks, pipeline funnel data, and start-up performance reports.
  • Day 4: Sprint Session (90 mins) → Breakthroughs:
    • No shared definition of a “high-potential founder.”
    • Support resources were spread too thin across the portfolio.
    • The fund’s positioning was more reactive than proactive — it didn’t own a distinctive narrative in the market.
  • Day 5–10: Synthesis → Insights consolidated into a Clarity Brief + Insight Canvas.
4. The Breakthrough

The Sprint revealed that the challenge wasn’t pipeline quality — it was lack of focus and positioning.

Three core insights provided the turning point:

  1. Portfolio Prioritisation Framework → defined clear criteria for where to double down.
  2. Founder Success Playbook → standardised support model for portfolio companies.
  3. Differentiated Narrative → repositioned the fund as “the accelerator of reinvention-ready founders.”
These shifts alone gave the fund a path to add an estimated £2M+ in portfolio value over the following 18 months, by concentrating capital and resources where they could move the needle most.
5. From Sprint to Action (4 Pillars Applied)

With clarity from the Sprint, Reinvantage created a tailored support plan:

  • Readiness → Coached partners on using the new prioritisation framework and trained the team on deploying the Founder Success Playbook.
  • Foresight → Ran scenario analysis on regional tech trends, helping the fund anticipate where capital would flow next.
  • Growth → Guided resource reallocation across the portfolio and supported new co-investor pitches for top-performing start-ups.
  • Positioning → Crafted a sharper brand story for the fund, positioning it as the reinvention partner for globally minded founders.
6. The Results
  • 10 portfolio companies onboarded to the new Playbook → greater consistency of support.
  • Raised follow-on capital for 3 top start-ups with the new prioritisation framework.
  • +26% increase in inbound deal flow from founders citing the fund’s new positioning.
  • Stronger internal cohesion → partners aligned on where to focus resources.
The client thought the problem was pipeline quality.
The Sprint showed it was actually lack of clarity and focus inside the firm.

By applying the four pillars, Reinvantage helped turn scattered effort into concentrated value creation.

The Sprint guaranteed at least £20,000 in value; here it set the stage for multi-million-pound upside in portfolio growth.

Case study: International impact Organisation

1. The Client

A large international impact organisation focused on entrepreneurship and economic empowerment.
The organisation runs multi-country programmes across Eastern Europe and Central Asia, often in partnership with global donors and corporate sponsors.

Role we worked with: Senior Programme Director, responsible for regional coordination.

2. The Challenge

The organisation had launched a flagship regional initiative supporting women entrepreneurs, but the programme was underperforming.

Key issues:

  • Fragmented delivery → each country office interpreted the programme differently.
  • Donor frustration → reporting lacked consistency and clear impact metrics.
  • Lost momentum → staff energy was spent on administration rather than scaling success stories.

Traditional programme reviews had produced long reports, but no real alignment or action.

3. The Sprint

We ran a 10-day Remote Reinvention Sprint with the regional leadership team and representatives from two country offices.

  • Day 1–3: Intake → Reviewed donor reports, programme KPIs, and field feedback.
  • Day 4: Sprint Session (90 mins) → Breakthroughs:
    • Donors cared about quantifiable outcomes, but reporting focused on stories.
    • Staff were duplicating efforts across countries, wasting time and resources.
    • The initiative lacked a clear theory of change — everyone described its purpose differently.
  • Day 5–10: Synthesis → Insights distilled into a Clarity Brief + Insight Canvas.
4. The Breakthrough

The Sprint revealed that the issue wasn’t donor pressure or programme design — it was a lack of shared framework and alignment.

Three critical insights reshaped the path forward:

  1. One Unified Theory of Change → agreed narrative for why the programme exists.
  2. Core Impact Metrics → clear, comparable KPIs across all countries.
  3. Smart Resource Sharing → digital hub to stop duplication and accelerate knowledge flow.
By eliminating duplicated reporting and clarifying what success looks like, the client saw they could save the equivalent of £100,000 in staff time annually — while also unlocking stronger donor confidence and follow-on funding opportunities.
5. From Sprint to Action (4 Pillars Applied)

Armed with Sprint clarity, Reinvantage proposed a laser-focused support plan:

  • Readiness → Trained programme leads on using the new metrics and integrated them into existing workflows.
  • Foresight → Analysed donor trends and expectations, aligning the initiative with the next funding cycle.
  • Growth → Developed a funding case based on the new unified theory of change, securing higher renewal chances.
  • Positioning → Crafted a regional success narrative and storytelling toolkit, helping them showcase results consistently across markets.
6. The Results
  • 30% less time spent on reporting → freed capacity for programme delivery.
  • Donor satisfaction improved → positive feedback on the clarity of impact evidence.
  • Secured new funding commitment → one major donor increased their contribution by 20%.
  • Stronger internal morale → staff felt they were working with clarity, not chaos.
The client thought it needed better donor management.
The Sprint revealed it needed a shared foundation across its teams.

By anchoring on the four pillars, Reinvantage turned alignment into efficiency gains and fresh funding opportunities.

The Sprint guaranteed at least £20,000 in value; here it unlocked both six-figure savings and future-proofed funding.

Case study: National digital development agency

1. The Client

A national digital development agency tasked with driving the government’s digital transformation agenda, including e-services, citizen portals, and smart city pilots.

Role we worked with: Director of Digital Transformation, supported by IT and service delivery leads from three ministries.

2. The Challenge

The agency had strong political backing but faced hurdles in implementation.

Key issues:

  • Siloed projects → each ministry developed digital tools independently, leading to duplication.
  • Citizen frustration → services were digital in name, but still required multiple logins and offline steps.
  • Funding pressure → international partners demanded clearer impact in the short term.

The agency wanted to accelerate momentum but struggled to get alignment across ministries.

3. The Sprint

We ran a 14-day Immersive Reinvention Sprint with the agency’s leadership and digital focal points from three ministries.

  • Day 1–3: Intake → Reviewed strategy docs, donor reports, and citizen feedback data.
  • Day 4: Immersive Sprint Session (half-day) → Breakthroughs:
    • Each ministry had different definitions of “digital service.”
    • 20% of budget was going into overlapping pilot projects.
    • Citizens’ top frustrations were known — but not prioritised.
  • Day 5–14: Synthesis → Insights consolidated into a Clarity Brief + Insight Canvas.
4. The Breakthrough

The Sprint revealed that the biggest blocker wasn’t lack of funding, but lack of shared priorities.

Three practical insights stood out:

  1. One Definition of Digital Service → agreed across ministries.
  2. Quick-Win Prioritisation → focus on top 3 citizen pain points (ID renewal, business registration, healthcare booking).
  3. Shared Resource Map → pool budgets to eliminate duplication.
These changes alone allowed the agency to unlock £75,000 in immediate savings and deliver 2–3 visible improvements in the next quarter — meeting donor expectations and building citizen trust.
5. From Sprint to Action (4 Pillars Applied)

Based on the Sprint clarity, Reinvantage proposed a modest, targeted package of support:

  • Readiness → Facilitated inter-ministerial workshops to embed the “one digital service” definition.
  • Foresight → Analysed citizen feedback trends to shape the quick-win roadmap.
  • Growth → Supported the reallocation of funds to joint projects, reducing overlap.
  • Positioning → Crafted a communication plan highlighting early digital wins to donors and citizens.
6. The Results
  • 2 pilot services integrated into the central portal (ID renewal + healthcare booking).
  • Budget savings of £75,000 from eliminating overlapping projects.
  • Citizen satisfaction up modestly → call centre complaints on digital services dropped by 12%.
  • Donor confidence improved → short-term impact report received positive feedback.
The client thought it needed more funding and bigger projects.
The Sprint revealed it first needed clarity and alignment.

By applying the four pillars to a targeted scope, Reinvantage helped deliver visible results within a single quarter — proving progress to citizens and donors and laying the groundwork for deeper transformation.