The brain drain challenge
Can governments reinvent themselves?
parallax background

In Brussels, the innovation penny drops

Europe has finally realised that it needs to catch up with the US and Asia

January 31, 2025

6 min read

January 31, 2025

6 min read

Photo by Testalize.me on Unsplash.

Europe just drew its line in the sand. The European Commission’s new Competitiveness Compass, published this week, isn’t just another policy document—it’s a call for sharper thinking and genuine speed.  

Commission President Ursula von der Leyen says Europe has all the ingredients for success: talent, capital, and a single market unlike any other. Yet the race is on. The global stage won’t wait while the EU sorts out its internal hurdles. 

For two decades, Europe has seen a widening gap in innovation and productivity compared with major rivals. That’s a worrying trend when other regions, from the United States to Asia, are boosting industrial output, investing in advanced technologies, and drawing top-tier talent.  

Europe can’t coast on its legacy. The Commission believes it must act fast, especially in the face of rising energy costs, shifting supply chains, and a climate imperative that grows more urgent every day. 

The Competitiveness Compass lays out a path to keep Europe in the game and perhaps even drive it. It banks on three core ideas: close the innovation gap, pursue decarbonisation without sinking industry, and reduce crippling dependencies that leave the EU exposed.  

Each sounds familiar, but the Commission argues it’s taking an integrated approach this time—one that merges economic ambition with environmental goals and security priorities, rather than treating them as separate boxes on a checklist. 

A rallying cry 

Von der Leyen’s rallying cry is clear: “Europe has everything it needs to succeed in the race to the top. But we must fix our weaknesses to regain competitiveness. The Competitiveness Compass transforms the excellent recommendations of the Draghi report into a roadmap. We have the political will. What matters is speed and unity.”  

She makes it sound almost straightforward—align 27 member states, overhaul entrenched practices, and take on global economic heavyweights. The key will be execution, not words. 

The first plank is all about innovation. The EU has a history of world-class research centres, brilliant scientists, and strong R&D in sectors like automotive and healthcare. But innovation often dies on the vine when it can’t jump from lab to large-scale market. The Commission proposes initiatives like “AI Gigafactories” to accelerate industrial adoption of artificial intelligence, plus a “28th legal regime” so start-ups can operate under a single set of rules, regardless of which country they call home. The goal is to build a habitat where creative thinking thrives and scaling across borders becomes second nature.  

It sounds ambitious, but the payoff could be huge if thousands of young businesses no longer struggle with red tape the moment they cross a national boundary. 

Wake-up call 

The second plank merges decarbonisation with competitiveness. High and volatile energy prices have given Europe a wake-up call, especially in energy-intensive sectors such as steel and chemicals.  

The Commission wants an Affordable Energy Action Plan to help push down costs, while an Industrial Decarbonisation Accelerator Act promises faster permitting for projects that slash emissions.  

Think of a more coordinated approach to building hydrogen infrastructure, modernising factories, and ensuring stable, greener supply chains. If done right, it could help Europe balance climate goals with a thriving industrial base. If done poorly, it risks layering extra bureaucratic hoops on industries that might pack up and leave. 

The third plank tackles security and diversification of supply. No one wants a replay of the sudden scrambling for medical gear or raw materials that shook Europe in recent crises.  

With trade deals spanning 76 countries, the EU has extensive reach, but it needs to weave that network into genuine partnerships.  

The Commission’s plan for Clean Trade and Investment Partnerships seeks deals that guarantee reliable access to crucial resources, from lithium for batteries to advanced semiconductors. Inside Europe, the Commission hints at revising public procurement rules to give preference to home-grown projects in critical sectors.  

That’s not about protectionism, officials say, but about ensuring resilience so Europe isn’t blindsided if a global power decides to squeeze supply lines. 

An end to bureaucracy? 

Beneath these three pillars sit five ‘horizontal enablers’. First, simplification is crucial: the Compass sets targets to chop administrative burdens by 25 per cent overall and 35 per cent for small and medium-sized enterprises. That’s big news for any business currently drowning in overlapping rules on everything from sustainability reporting to product labelling.

The second enabler is strengthening the single market by removing leftover obstacles and standardising rules faster. The Commission sees that as the engine of Europe’s success, but in practice it’s a patchwork of national regulations that often trip up entrepreneurs. 

Financing competitiveness is the third enabler. The Commission notes that Europe is rich in savings but poor in turning those funds into growth capital. So it wants a European Savings and Investments Union—an initiative to spur risk funding, unify capital markets, and funnel more money to promising ventures.  

The fourth enabler is skills and quality jobs. Without them, innovation remains a buzzword. The Commission’s plan for a ‘Union of Skills’ will boost adult learning, retraining, and labour mobility, plus make it easier for qualified people from outside the EU to join Europe’s workforce. 

Finally, there’s coordination. Too many grand plans from Brussels flounder when national governments fail to follow through. The proposed Competitiveness Coordination Tool hopes to keep everyone on the same page, tracking reforms and investments at both EU and national levels.  

To fund it all, a Competitiveness Fund might combine various instruments under one umbrella, rather than scatter them across countless programmes with slightly different objectives. 

The time for action has arrived 

The global context looms large. China and the US are sinking billions into AI and advanced manufacturing, and other regions aspire to draw industrial capacity that Europe might lose.  

For Stéphane Séjourné, the Commission’s Executive Vice-President for Prosperity and Industrial Strategy, the new doctrine is simple: “Competitiveness in every euro we spend, and in every initiative we propose.” It’s meant to be a mental shift as much as a policy tweak—a promise to measure every action by whether it makes Europe more dynamic. 

Whether the EU can pull this off without slipping into a maze of procedures and political disputes remains to be seen.  

The Commission insists the time for consensus is over; the time for action has arrived. Speed is the watchword. Unity is the challenge. But the opportunity is real. By modernising supply chains, expanding research frontiers, cutting red tape, and making clean energy viable at scale, Europe could rewrite its economic story and outpace those who doubt its capacity for reinvention. 

If it manages that, the Competitiveness Compass will be remembered as the moment Brussels replaced tired talk with real impact.  

If it hesitates, the best ideas might slip away to regions that can push them faster. Right now, the Commission says there’s a plan, the political will, and a clear sense of urgency.  

Europe’s future might hinge on whether all 27 member states and countless businesses decide to seize that momentum—together and without delay.

Photo by Testalize.me on Unsplash.

Marek Grzegorczyk

Marek Grzegorczyk

Marek Grzegorczyk is an analyst at Reinvantage.

Share

Case study: Global technology company

1. The Client

A global technology company operating across EMEA, with a regional HQ in Istanbul. The company manages 20+ markets, handling everything from brand campaigns to strategic partnerships.

Role we worked with: The EMEA Head of Marketing (supported by two regional managers).

2. The Challenge

Despite strong products and a respected global brand, the regional team was struggling with:

  • Misaligned strategy across markets → campaigns executed with inconsistent narratives.
  • Slowed growth → lead generation plateaued despite increasing spend.
  • Internal friction → marketing, sales, and product teams disagreed on KPIs and priorities.

Traditional fixes (more meetings, more reporting) only created more noise.

3. The Sprint

We ran a 10-day Remote Reinvention Sprint with the regional HQ team.

  • Day 1–3: Intake → Reviewed decks, campaign data, and plans.
  • Day 4: Sprint Session (90 mins) → Breakthroughs:
    • Sales and marketing had different definitions of “qualified lead.”
    • 40% of spend was going into low-potential markets.
    • The team assumed the problem was lack of budget, but it was actually lack of alignment.
  • Day 5–10: Synthesis → Insights distilled into a Clarity Brief + Insight Canvas.
4. The Breakthrough

The Sprint uncovered that the issue wasn’t budget, but fragmentation.
Three sharp insights unlocked a way forward:

  1. Unified KPIs bridging marketing + sales.
  2. Market prioritisation → shifting budget to 5 high-potential markets.
  3. Simplified narrative → one EMEA core story, locally adaptable.
By just realigning resources and focus, the client could unlock an estimated £250,000 in efficiency gains within the next 12 months — far exceeding the Sprint’s value guarantee. The path to higher returns was already inside the business, hidden by misalignment.
5. From Sprint to Action (4 Pillars Applied)

With clarity secured, Reinvantage didn’t suggest “more projects.”

Instead, we used the Sprint findings to create laser-focused next steps — drawing only from the areas that would deliver the most impact:

  • Readiness → Alignment workshops for sales + marketing teams. New playbooks clarified “qualified lead” definitions and reduced internal disputes.
  • Foresight → A market-opportunity scan identified which 5 countries would deliver the highest ROI, removing the guesswork from allocation.
  • Growth → Guided the reallocation of €2M budget and designed a phased rollout strategy that protected risk while maximising return.
  • Positioning → Built a messaging framework balancing global consistency with local nuance, ensuring campaigns spoke with one clear voice.

Because the Sprint had stripped away noise, these actions weren’t generic consulting ideas — they were directly tied to the breakthroughs.

6. The Results
  • +28% increase in qualified leads across the region.
  • 30% faster campaign rollout due to streamlined approvals.
  • Budget efficiency gains → €2M redirected from low-return to high-potential markets.
  • Internal cohesion → marketing + sales now use a single shared dashboard.
The client came in believing they needed more budget.
The Sprint revealed that what they really needed was clarity and alignment.

With that clarity, the four pillars became not theory, but practical tools to deliver measurable impact.

The Sprint guaranteed at least £20,000 in value — but in this case, it helped unlock more than 10x that within six months.

Case study: Regional VC fund & accelerator

1. The Client

A regional venture capital fund and accelerator focused on early-stage tech start-ups in the Baltics and Central Europe.

The fund had raised a new round and was under pressure to deliver stronger returns while also building its reputation as the go-to platform for founders.

Role we worked with: Managing Partner, supported by the Head of Portfolio Development.

2. The Challenge

Despite a promising portfolio, results were uneven.

Key issues:

  • Scattered portfolio support → no consistent playbook for start-ups, every partner did things differently.
  • Weak differentiation → founders and co-investors saw the fund as “one of many” in the region.
  • Stretched team → too many small bets, not enough clarity on which companies to double down on.

The leadership team knew something was off, but disagreed on whether the issue was pipeline quality, market conditions, or internal capacity.

3. The Sprint

We ran a 10-day Remote Reinvention Sprint with the partners and portfolio team.

  • Day 1–3: Intake → Reviewed pitch decks, pipeline funnel data, and start-up performance reports.
  • Day 4: Sprint Session (90 mins) → Breakthroughs:
    • No shared definition of a “high-potential founder.”
    • Support resources were spread too thin across the portfolio.
    • The fund’s positioning was more reactive than proactive — it didn’t own a distinctive narrative in the market.
  • Day 5–10: Synthesis → Insights consolidated into a Clarity Brief + Insight Canvas.
4. The Breakthrough

The Sprint revealed that the challenge wasn’t pipeline quality — it was lack of focus and positioning.

Three core insights provided the turning point:

  1. Portfolio Prioritisation Framework → defined clear criteria for where to double down.
  2. Founder Success Playbook → standardised support model for portfolio companies.
  3. Differentiated Narrative → repositioned the fund as “the accelerator of reinvention-ready founders.”
These shifts alone gave the fund a path to add an estimated £2M+ in portfolio value over the following 18 months, by concentrating capital and resources where they could move the needle most.
5. From Sprint to Action (4 Pillars Applied)

With clarity from the Sprint, Reinvantage created a tailored support plan:

  • Readiness → Coached partners on using the new prioritisation framework and trained the team on deploying the Founder Success Playbook.
  • Foresight → Ran scenario analysis on regional tech trends, helping the fund anticipate where capital would flow next.
  • Growth → Guided resource reallocation across the portfolio and supported new co-investor pitches for top-performing start-ups.
  • Positioning → Crafted a sharper brand story for the fund, positioning it as the reinvention partner for globally minded founders.
6. The Results
  • 10 portfolio companies onboarded to the new Playbook → greater consistency of support.
  • Raised follow-on capital for 3 top start-ups with the new prioritisation framework.
  • +26% increase in inbound deal flow from founders citing the fund’s new positioning.
  • Stronger internal cohesion → partners aligned on where to focus resources.
The client thought the problem was pipeline quality.
The Sprint showed it was actually lack of clarity and focus inside the firm.

By applying the four pillars, Reinvantage helped turn scattered effort into concentrated value creation.

The Sprint guaranteed at least £20,000 in value; here it set the stage for multi-million-pound upside in portfolio growth.

Case study: International impact Organisation

1. The Client

A large international impact organisation focused on entrepreneurship and economic empowerment.
The organisation runs multi-country programmes across Eastern Europe and Central Asia, often in partnership with global donors and corporate sponsors.

Role we worked with: Senior Programme Director, responsible for regional coordination.

2. The Challenge

The organisation had launched a flagship regional initiative supporting women entrepreneurs, but the programme was underperforming.

Key issues:

  • Fragmented delivery → each country office interpreted the programme differently.
  • Donor frustration → reporting lacked consistency and clear impact metrics.
  • Lost momentum → staff energy was spent on administration rather than scaling success stories.

Traditional programme reviews had produced long reports, but no real alignment or action.

3. The Sprint

We ran a 10-day Remote Reinvention Sprint with the regional leadership team and representatives from two country offices.

  • Day 1–3: Intake → Reviewed donor reports, programme KPIs, and field feedback.
  • Day 4: Sprint Session (90 mins) → Breakthroughs:
    • Donors cared about quantifiable outcomes, but reporting focused on stories.
    • Staff were duplicating efforts across countries, wasting time and resources.
    • The initiative lacked a clear theory of change — everyone described its purpose differently.
  • Day 5–10: Synthesis → Insights distilled into a Clarity Brief + Insight Canvas.
4. The Breakthrough

The Sprint revealed that the issue wasn’t donor pressure or programme design — it was a lack of shared framework and alignment.

Three critical insights reshaped the path forward:

  1. One Unified Theory of Change → agreed narrative for why the programme exists.
  2. Core Impact Metrics → clear, comparable KPIs across all countries.
  3. Smart Resource Sharing → digital hub to stop duplication and accelerate knowledge flow.
By eliminating duplicated reporting and clarifying what success looks like, the client saw they could save the equivalent of £100,000 in staff time annually — while also unlocking stronger donor confidence and follow-on funding opportunities.
5. From Sprint to Action (4 Pillars Applied)

Armed with Sprint clarity, Reinvantage proposed a laser-focused support plan:

  • Readiness → Trained programme leads on using the new metrics and integrated them into existing workflows.
  • Foresight → Analysed donor trends and expectations, aligning the initiative with the next funding cycle.
  • Growth → Developed a funding case based on the new unified theory of change, securing higher renewal chances.
  • Positioning → Crafted a regional success narrative and storytelling toolkit, helping them showcase results consistently across markets.
6. The Results
  • 30% less time spent on reporting → freed capacity for programme delivery.
  • Donor satisfaction improved → positive feedback on the clarity of impact evidence.
  • Secured new funding commitment → one major donor increased their contribution by 20%.
  • Stronger internal morale → staff felt they were working with clarity, not chaos.
The client thought it needed better donor management.
The Sprint revealed it needed a shared foundation across its teams.

By anchoring on the four pillars, Reinvantage turned alignment into efficiency gains and fresh funding opportunities.

The Sprint guaranteed at least £20,000 in value; here it unlocked both six-figure savings and future-proofed funding.

Case study: National digital development agency

1. The Client

A national digital development agency tasked with driving the government’s digital transformation agenda, including e-services, citizen portals, and smart city pilots.

Role we worked with: Director of Digital Transformation, supported by IT and service delivery leads from three ministries.

2. The Challenge

The agency had strong political backing but faced hurdles in implementation.

Key issues:

  • Siloed projects → each ministry developed digital tools independently, leading to duplication.
  • Citizen frustration → services were digital in name, but still required multiple logins and offline steps.
  • Funding pressure → international partners demanded clearer impact in the short term.

The agency wanted to accelerate momentum but struggled to get alignment across ministries.

3. The Sprint

We ran a 14-day Immersive Reinvention Sprint with the agency’s leadership and digital focal points from three ministries.

  • Day 1–3: Intake → Reviewed strategy docs, donor reports, and citizen feedback data.
  • Day 4: Immersive Sprint Session (half-day) → Breakthroughs:
    • Each ministry had different definitions of “digital service.”
    • 20% of budget was going into overlapping pilot projects.
    • Citizens’ top frustrations were known — but not prioritised.
  • Day 5–14: Synthesis → Insights consolidated into a Clarity Brief + Insight Canvas.
4. The Breakthrough

The Sprint revealed that the biggest blocker wasn’t lack of funding, but lack of shared priorities.

Three practical insights stood out:

  1. One Definition of Digital Service → agreed across ministries.
  2. Quick-Win Prioritisation → focus on top 3 citizen pain points (ID renewal, business registration, healthcare booking).
  3. Shared Resource Map → pool budgets to eliminate duplication.
These changes alone allowed the agency to unlock £75,000 in immediate savings and deliver 2–3 visible improvements in the next quarter — meeting donor expectations and building citizen trust.
5. From Sprint to Action (4 Pillars Applied)

Based on the Sprint clarity, Reinvantage proposed a modest, targeted package of support:

  • Readiness → Facilitated inter-ministerial workshops to embed the “one digital service” definition.
  • Foresight → Analysed citizen feedback trends to shape the quick-win roadmap.
  • Growth → Supported the reallocation of funds to joint projects, reducing overlap.
  • Positioning → Crafted a communication plan highlighting early digital wins to donors and citizens.
6. The Results
  • 2 pilot services integrated into the central portal (ID renewal + healthcare booking).
  • Budget savings of £75,000 from eliminating overlapping projects.
  • Citizen satisfaction up modestly → call centre complaints on digital services dropped by 12%.
  • Donor confidence improved → short-term impact report received positive feedback.
The client thought it needed more funding and bigger projects.
The Sprint revealed it first needed clarity and alignment.

By applying the four pillars to a targeted scope, Reinvantage helped deliver visible results within a single quarter — proving progress to citizens and donors and laying the groundwork for deeper transformation.